<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Half the Sky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/10millionwords/2009/11/01/review-half-the-sky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/10millionwords/2009/11/01/review-half-the-sky/</link>
	<description>A Year of Reading All of America&#039;a Bestsellers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/10millionwords/2009/11/01/review-half-the-sky/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10millionwords.com/?p=152#comment-74</guid>
		<description>You commend the authors for &quot;nicely&quot; mixing the &quot;theoretical and the practical,&quot; but your counter-solution to their education emphasis -- &quot;Only the Christian faith affirms the value and equality of women&quot; -- falls squarely and only into the theoretical category.  What&#039;s the difference between a Koran that is not misogynistic and Bible that&#039;s not if neither religion can be commended for a &quot;practical&quot; response to the suffering of women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You commend the authors for &#8220;nicely&#8221; mixing the &#8220;theoretical and the practical,&#8221; but your counter-solution to their education emphasis &#8212; &#8220;Only the Christian faith affirms the value and equality of women&#8221; &#8212; falls squarely and only into the theoretical category.  What&#8217;s the difference between a Koran that is not misogynistic and Bible that&#8217;s not if neither religion can be commended for a &#8220;practical&#8221; response to the suffering of women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/10millionwords/2009/11/01/review-half-the-sky/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>DR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10millionwords.com/?p=152#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Tim 

Thank you for your review and warnings to Christians. The wonderful thing here illustrated is that men and women made in the image of God and by His grace are still capable of wonderful acts of mercy, of using wisdom, love, kindness, gentleness .. to these poor women of the world .. who have suffered so terribly.

Could you make a comment or two as to why you would or would not support the varieties of organisations who support women suffering oppression? In what ways are the worldviews being expressed between say a non Christian NGO group and a Christian NGO group different?  Does it matter in the end?  If at the end women are being helped out of misery isn&#039;t that enough? (I say this to expand some things you have hinted at - but need to expand on - so Christians can see what you are driving at as someone who hold to a Christian worldview shaped by the gospel of grace...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim </p>
<p>Thank you for your review and warnings to Christians. The wonderful thing here illustrated is that men and women made in the image of God and by His grace are still capable of wonderful acts of mercy, of using wisdom, love, kindness, gentleness .. to these poor women of the world .. who have suffered so terribly.</p>
<p>Could you make a comment or two as to why you would or would not support the varieties of organisations who support women suffering oppression? In what ways are the worldviews being expressed between say a non Christian NGO group and a Christian NGO group different?  Does it matter in the end?  If at the end women are being helped out of misery isn&#8217;t that enough? (I say this to expand some things you have hinted at &#8211; but need to expand on &#8211; so Christians can see what you are driving at as someone who hold to a Christian worldview shaped by the gospel of grace&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katelyn Beaty</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/10millionwords/2009/11/01/review-half-the-sky/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Katelyn Beaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10millionwords.com/?p=152#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the review, Tim, and for drawing attention to what sounds like a must-read book. I&#039;m thankful for the common grace that shines through journalistic work like this, from two authors who seemingly have no belief in Christ, yet are doing truth-telling work. 

One concern I have about the review, in the 3rd paragraph: Tim writes, &quot;One thing that impressed me about this book was that, while it was written about women, it did not ever fall into outright feminism.&quot; Do we have room in our biblical theology for women-centered work that isn&#039;t confused with feminism? Must ministries or books that aim to shed light on hardships faced by women worldwide always be dangerously tip-toeing toward feminism? The word is clearly a dirty one in most Christian conversations, and keeps many of us from acknowledging good work when acknowledgment is due. Either a more precise definition of feminism, or another way of understanding ministry done on behalf of women, seems to be in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the review, Tim, and for drawing attention to what sounds like a must-read book. I&#8217;m thankful for the common grace that shines through journalistic work like this, from two authors who seemingly have no belief in Christ, yet are doing truth-telling work. </p>
<p>One concern I have about the review, in the 3rd paragraph: Tim writes, &#8220;One thing that impressed me about this book was that, while it was written about women, it did not ever fall into outright feminism.&#8221; Do we have room in our biblical theology for women-centered work that isn&#8217;t confused with feminism? Must ministries or books that aim to shed light on hardships faced by women worldwide always be dangerously tip-toeing toward feminism? The word is clearly a dirty one in most Christian conversations, and keeps many of us from acknowledging good work when acknowledgment is due. Either a more precise definition of feminism, or another way of understanding ministry done on behalf of women, seems to be in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh S.</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/10millionwords/2009/11/01/review-half-the-sky/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10millionwords.com/?p=152#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious — does anyone seriously argue that man is &quot;innately good&quot;? I can see how a case can be made for moral neutrality, but not for innate goodness, even if most folks are in general good to one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious — does anyone seriously argue that man is &#8220;innately good&#8221;? I can see how a case can be made for moral neutrality, but not for innate goodness, even if most folks are in general good to one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

