<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview with Jonathan Pennington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/</link>
	<description>Between Two Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:46:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Combs</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8984</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8984</guid>
		<description>Johathan,&lt;br/&gt;Not all Classical D make a distinction between the Kingdom of Heaven and God. Not even everyone who taught at Dallas Seminary. I teach at a Classical D school and graduated from Grace Theological Seminary (which for most of its history was a Classical D school), neither of which held to this distinction. My theology teacher when I was at Tennessee Temple (a Classical D school), who was trained by Ryrie, did not hold to the distinction. I am not sure what the percentages would actually be among Classical D--those who do and those who do not make the distinction--, but in my experience in Classical D, my guess is that in the last 40 years there have actually been more Classical D who have not made the distinction--but I could be wrong. Anyway, I look forward to studying your viewpoint more thoroughly.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bill Combs&lt;br/&gt;Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johathan,<br />Not all Classical D make a distinction between the Kingdom of Heaven and God. Not even everyone who taught at Dallas Seminary. I teach at a Classical D school and graduated from Grace Theological Seminary (which for most of its history was a Classical D school), neither of which held to this distinction. My theology teacher when I was at Tennessee Temple (a Classical D school), who was trained by Ryrie, did not hold to the distinction. I am not sure what the percentages would actually be among Classical D&#8211;those who do and those who do not make the distinction&#8211;, but in my experience in Classical D, my guess is that in the last 40 years there have actually been more Classical D who have not made the distinction&#8211;but I could be wrong. Anyway, I look forward to studying your viewpoint more thoroughly.</p>
<p>Bill Combs<br />Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridges</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8972</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8972</guid>
		<description>As an aside, I appreciate Dr. Pennington.  Though he did not know me, he offered some very helpful advice via e-mail to me and my family before we moved here to Scotland. Just wanted to give a &quot;shout out&quot; to him.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Great interview, JT.  Thanks for all of your work.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Tim Bridges</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aside, I appreciate Dr. Pennington.  Though he did not know me, he offered some very helpful advice via e-mail to me and my family before we moved here to Scotland. Just wanted to give a &#8220;shout out&#8221; to him.</p>
<p>Great interview, JT.  Thanks for all of your work.</p>
<p>Tim Bridges</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJP</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8950</link>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8950</guid>
		<description>Yes, reading Ladd, one does get a lot of &quot;already.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Reading the NT, I get a great deal more &quot;not yet.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, reading Ladd, one does get a lot of &#8220;already.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reading the NT, I get a great deal more &#8220;not yet.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Pinkley</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8934</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Pinkley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8934</guid>
		<description>This was extremely helpful. Please continue interviews or posts like this!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;--Drew Pinkley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was extremely helpful. Please continue interviews or posts like this!</p>
<p>&#8211;Drew Pinkley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTPennington</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8931</link>
		<dc:creator>JTPennington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8931</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments. I thought I&#039;d just drop a note to say that while I do disagree with Dispensationalism in all its forms, I am aware that Progressive D has evolved considerably from the older days (and this is good!). This is why I was careful in my brief comments to call it Classical D and to mention Progressive D separately. From what I&#039;ve read in Progressive D I was fairly certain that they didn&#039;t hold this view, but then again, it is a diverse crowd. I was trying to be careful and fair by not wrongly stating their position(s).&lt;br/&gt;Also, I realize in this short interview that I didn&#039;t explicitly mention &#039;already but not yet&#039;, but this is certainly central to my thinking. It is what I hint at with my comments about the current tension between God&#039;s reign in heaven and our Lord&#039;s Prayer hope for that to fully come on earth. This crucial notion informs all my eschatological understanding.&lt;br/&gt;-- Blessings,&lt;br/&gt;JTPennington</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments. I thought I&#8217;d just drop a note to say that while I do disagree with Dispensationalism in all its forms, I am aware that Progressive D has evolved considerably from the older days (and this is good!). This is why I was careful in my brief comments to call it Classical D and to mention Progressive D separately. From what I&#8217;ve read in Progressive D I was fairly certain that they didn&#8217;t hold this view, but then again, it is a diverse crowd. I was trying to be careful and fair by not wrongly stating their position(s).<br />Also, I realize in this short interview that I didn&#8217;t explicitly mention &#8216;already but not yet&#8217;, but this is certainly central to my thinking. It is what I hint at with my comments about the current tension between God&#8217;s reign in heaven and our Lord&#8217;s Prayer hope for that to fully come on earth. This crucial notion informs all my eschatological understanding.<br />&#8211; Blessings,<br />JTPennington</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8930</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8930</guid>
		<description>Blaising and Bock&#039;s book, Progressive Dispensationalism, lays out the view pretty clearly, which is vehemently already-but-not-yet. This is one of the features of Prog Disp, and what sets it apart from &quot;Classical Disp,&quot; as well as &quot;Revised Disp.&quot; In fact, PG is so progressive that many of the Revised Disp (such as Ryrie and a few others) have stated that PD is not even dispensationalism at all. In my understanding, the work of Ladd and others was highly influential on this matter.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Blessings,&lt;br/&gt;Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blaising and Bock&#8217;s book, Progressive Dispensationalism, lays out the view pretty clearly, which is vehemently already-but-not-yet. This is one of the features of Prog Disp, and what sets it apart from &#8220;Classical Disp,&#8221; as well as &#8220;Revised Disp.&#8221; In fact, PG is so progressive that many of the Revised Disp (such as Ryrie and a few others) have stated that PD is not even dispensationalism at all. In my understanding, the work of Ladd and others was highly influential on this matter.</p>
<p>Blessings,<br />Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8927</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8927</guid>
		<description>Hi JT,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Some dispensationalists do not.  I am not one of those.  I do believe in an already aspect of Christ&#039;s Kingdom.  Dispensationalists are divided on that issue, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JT,</p>
<p>Some dispensationalists do not.  I am not one of those.  I do believe in an already aspect of Christ&#8217;s Kingdom.  Dispensationalists are divided on that issue, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8926</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8926</guid>
		<description>So you guys would see &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; &quot;already&quot; aspect to the kingdom? I find that pretty hard to believe! I thought Ladd&#039;s case in his NT Theology won the day pretty clearly on that issue.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;JT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you guys would see <i>no</i> &#8220;already&#8221; aspect to the kingdom? I find that pretty hard to believe! I thought Ladd&#8217;s case in his NT Theology won the day pretty clearly on that issue.</p>
<p>JT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8925</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8925</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll chime in on djp&#039;s comments.  I am basically a dispensationalist (maybe I qualify as a progressive dispensationalists), and I went to a strongly dispensationalists seminary.  I have heard that some older dispensationalists tried to make the Kingdom of heaven/God distinction, but that it never was widely accepted and certainly is not accepted by most, if any, dispensationalists today.  I think almost all would hold to the current &quot;reverential&quot; view.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Many dispensationalists would see the &quot;Kingdom of God/Heaven&quot; as an entirely future reign of Christ on earth.  Many others, however, would see in it current aspects of Christ&#039;s rule as well.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hardly any dispensationalists, to my knowledge, (and I think I am fairly familiar with the mainstream of dispensationalism) would believe what Dr. Pennington described as the &quot;classical&quot; dispensational view.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It is unfortanate that scholarly circles are so uninformed about such a significant (even if unrespected) element of evangelical theology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll chime in on djp&#8217;s comments.  I am basically a dispensationalist (maybe I qualify as a progressive dispensationalists), and I went to a strongly dispensationalists seminary.  I have heard that some older dispensationalists tried to make the Kingdom of heaven/God distinction, but that it never was widely accepted and certainly is not accepted by most, if any, dispensationalists today.  I think almost all would hold to the current &#8220;reverential&#8221; view.  </p>
<p>Many dispensationalists would see the &#8220;Kingdom of God/Heaven&#8221; as an entirely future reign of Christ on earth.  Many others, however, would see in it current aspects of Christ&#8217;s rule as well.</p>
<p>Hardly any dispensationalists, to my knowledge, (and I think I am fairly familiar with the mainstream of dispensationalism) would believe what Dr. Pennington described as the &#8220;classical&#8221; dispensational view.</p>
<p>It is unfortanate that scholarly circles are so uninformed about such a significant (even if unrespected) element of evangelical theology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8922</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8922</guid>
		<description>Sounds a lot like NT Wright&#039;s work on the gospels and the Kingdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds a lot like NT Wright&#8217;s work on the gospels and the Kingdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Bird</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8921</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8921</guid>
		<description>JT, great interview. More like this please! Pennington is a great guy with a heart of godly gold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT, great interview. More like this please! Pennington is a great guy with a heart of godly gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitamin Z</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8920</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitamin Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8920</guid>
		<description>When are you going to interview me?  We could talk about Jerry and Todd. It would rock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are you going to interview me?  We could talk about Jerry and Todd. It would rock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJP</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2007/01/09/interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8915</link>
		<dc:creator>DJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blog/btw/2007/01/09/an-interview-with-jonathan-pennington/#comment-8915</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, thanks.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are there dispensationalists who distinguish the phrases today? I&#039;m one, and I don&#039;t. When was the last time one did?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Puzzles me that this is his specialty, so to speak, and he doesn&#039;t know the progressive dispensationalist view.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I appreciate that he consistently refers to the kingdom as futue. I&#039;d have liked to see him asked about the already/not-yet, realized eschatology canard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, thanks.</p>
<p>Are there dispensationalists who distinguish the phrases today? I&#8217;m one, and I don&#8217;t. When was the last time one did?</p>
<p>Puzzles me that this is his specialty, so to speak, and he doesn&#8217;t know the progressive dispensationalist view.</p>
<p>I appreciate that he consistently refers to the kingdom as futue. I&#8217;d have liked to see him asked about the already/not-yet, realized eschatology canard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

