Tozer’s Contradiction and His Approach to Piety
For what it is, namely a life narrative, A Passion for God was a worthwhile read.
And yet, Dorsett exposes a fundamental contradiction in Tozer’s character that raises all sorts of questions about holy zeal and its effect on the whole of life. The contradiction could be summed up: how did Tozer reconcile his passionate longing for communion with the Triune God with his failure to love passionately his wife and children? Perhaps the most damning statement in the book was from his wife, after she remarried subsequent to his death: “I have never been happier in my life,” Ada Ceclia Tozer Odam observed, “Aiden [Tozer] loved Jesus Christ, but Leonard Odam loves me” (160).
Now, certainly all human beings have flaws; that is not the point here. Rather, the point that Dorsett failed to explore adequately is how Tozer reconciled his pursuit of God with his failure to pursue his wife. This reconciliation–or failure to reconcile–should have raised questions about Tozer’s mystic approach and prophetic denunciation of the church and nuanced the value of his teaching on the Christian life. After all, if his piety could spend several hours in prayer and also rationalize his failure at home, then it should raise questions about his approach to piety.
Then again, we all live divided lives. And thankfully, God used his Word as proclaimed through Tozer to bring Leonard Odam himself and hundreds of others to a saving knowledge of Christ. When God promises that his Word will not return to him empty (Isaiah 55:11), it gives all of his servants hope that the working is from God, not from ourselves (Col. 1:28-29). After all, God is able to use clay pots (2 Cor 4:7): he used A. W. Tozer with this glaring personal contradiction and he can use you and me.
John Piper writes in with a helpful caution:
Sean Lucas seems to say that Tozer‚Äôs wife‚Äôs greater happiness with her second husband implies Tozer‚Äôs ‚Äúfailure to love passionately his wife.‚ÄĚ When she remarried after his death she said, ‚Äú”I have never been happier in my life. . . “Aiden [A. W. Tozer] loved Jesus Christ, but Leonard Odam loves me.‚ÄĚ Lucas may be right to infer from this sentence that Tozer loved his wife poorly. But Tozer‚Äôs wife‚Äôs statement does not prove it.
We would need to be as penetrating in our analysis of her spiritual condition as we are of A. W. Tozer‚Äôs. Not feeling loved and not being loved are not the same. Jesus loved all people well. And many did not like the way he loved them. Was David‚Äôs zeal for the Lord imbalanced because his wife Michal despised him for it? Was Job‚Äôs devotion to the Lord inordinate because his wife urged him to curse God and die? Would Gomer be a reliable witness to Hosea‚Äôs devotion? I know nothing about Tozer‚Äôs wife. She may have been far more godly than he. Or maybe not. It would be helpful to know.
Again I admit Lucas may be totally right. Tozer may have blown it at home. Lucas‚Äô lessons from this possibility are wise. But I have seen so much emotional blackmail in my ministry I am jealous to raise a warning against it. Emotional blackmail happens when a person equates his or her emotional pain with another person‚Äôs failure to love. They aren‚Äôt the same. A person may love well and the beloved still feel hurt, and use the hurt to blackmail the lover into admitting guilt he or she does not have. Emotional blackmail says, ‚ÄúIf I feel hurt by you, you are guilty.‚ÄĚ There is no defense. The hurt person has become God. His emotion has become judge and jury. Truth does not matter. All that matters is the sovereign suffering of the aggrieved. It is above question. This emotional device is a great evil. I have seen it often in my three decades of ministry and I am eager to defend people who are being wrongly indicted by it.
I am not saying Tozer‚Äôs wife did this. I am saying that the assumption that her feeling unloved equals her being unloved creates the atmosphere where emotional blackmail flourishes.
Maybe Tozer loved his wife poorly. But his wife‚Äôs superior happiness with another man does not show it. Perhaps Lyle Dorsett‚Äôs new biography of Tozer, A Passion for God, penetrates to the bottom of this relationship.
Update: From Tim Challies’s review on Friday:
During the 1930s Tozer read voraciously, and he also developed a magnificent obsession to be in Christ‚Äôs presence- just to worship Him and to be with Him.‚ÄĚ Yet he was a man who was emotionally and spiritually distant from his own wife. ‚ÄúBy early 1928 the Tozers had a routine. Aiden found his fulfillment in reading, preparing sermons, preaching, and weaving travel into his demanding and exciting schedule, while Ada learned to cope. She dutifully washed, ironed, cooked, and cared for the little ones, and developed the art of shoving her pain deep down inside. Most of the time she pretended there was no hurt, but when it erupted, she usually blamed herself for not being godly enough to conquer her longing for intimacy from an emotionally aloof husband.‚ÄĚ
These strange inconsistencies abound. Tozer saw his wife‚Äôs gifts for hospitality and encouraged her in them; yet he disliked having visitors in his own home. He preached about the necessity of Christian fellowship within the family of Christ; yet he refused to allow his family or his wife‚Äôs family to visit their home. For every laudable area of his life there seemed to exist an equal and opposite error. This study in opposites leaves for a fascinating picture of a man who was used so greatly by God, even while his life had such obvious sin.