Have you heard the New Gospel?  It’s not been codified. It’s not owned by any one person or movement.  But it is increasingly common.

The New Gospel generally has four parts to it.

It usually starts with an apology: “I’m sorry for my fellow Christians. I understand why you hate Christianity.  It’s like that thing Gandhi said, ‘why can’t the Christians be more like their Christ?’  Christians are hypocritical, judgmental, and self-righteous.  I know we screwed up with the Crusades, slavery, and the Witch Trials.  All I can say is: I apologize.  We’ve not give you a reason to believe.”

Then there is an appeal to God as love: “I know you’ve seen the preachers with the sandwich boards and bullhorns saying ‘Repent or Die.’ But I’m here to tell you God is love. Look at Jesus.  He hung out with prostitutes and tax collectors.  He loved unconditionally.  There is so much brokenness in the world, but the good news of the Bible is that God came to live right in the middle of our brokenness. He’s a messy God and his mission is love.  ‘I did not come into the world to condemn the world,’ that’s what Jesus said (John 3:17).  He loved everyone, no matter who you were or what you had done. That’s what got him killed.”

The third part of the New Gospel is an invitation to join God on his mission in the world:  “It’s a shame that Christians haven’t shown the world this God.  But that’s what we are called to do.  God’s kingdom is being established on earth.  On earth!  Not in some distant heaven after we die, but right here, right now.  Even though we all mess up, we are God’s agents to show his love and bring this kingdom.  And we don’t do that by scaring people with religious language or by forcing them into some religious mold.  We do it by love.  That’s the way of Jesus.  That’s what it means to follow him.  We love our neighbor and work for peace and justice.  God wants us to become the good news for a troubled planet.”

And finally, there is a studied ambivalence about eternity: “Don’t get me wrong, I still believe in life after death.  But our focus should be on what kind of life we can live right now.  Will some people go to hell when they die?  Who am I to say? Does God really require the right prayer or the right statement of faith to get into heaven?  I don’t know, but I guess I can leave that in his hands. My job is not to judge people, but to bless. In the end, God’s amazing grace may surprise us all.  That’s certainly what I hope for.”

Why So Hot?
This way of telling the good news of Christianity is very chic.  It’s popular for several reasons.

1. It is partially true. God is love. The kingdom has come. Christians can be stupid. The particulars of the New Gospel are often justifiable.

2. It deals with strawmen.  The bad guys are apocalyptic street preachers, Crusaders, and caricatures of an evangelical view of salvation.

3. The New Gospel leads people to believe wrong things without explicitly stating those wrong things.  That is, Christians who espouse the New Gospel feel safe from criticism because they never actually said belief is unimportant, or there is no hell, or that Jesus isn’t the only way, or that God has no wrath, or that there is no need for repentance.  These distortions are not explicitly stated, but the New Gospel is presented in such a way that non-believers could, and by design should, come to these conclusions.  In other words, the New Gospel allows the non-Christian to hear what he wants, while still providing an out against criticism from other Christians.  The preacher of the New Gospel can always say when challenged, “But I never said I don’t believe those things.”

4. It is manageable.  The New Gospel meets people where they are and leaves them there.  It appeals to love and helping our neighbors.  And it makes the appeal in a way that repudiates any hint of judgmentalism, intolerance, or religiosity.  This is bound to be popular. It tells us what we want to hear and gives us something we can do.

5. The New Gospel is inspirational. This is what makes the message so appealing to young people in particular. They get the thrill and purpose of being part of a big cause, without all the baggage of the Church’s history, doctrine, and hard edges. Who wouldn’t want to join a revolution of love?

6. The New Gospel has no offense to it.  This is why the message is so attractive.  The bad guys are all “out there.”  This can be a problem for any of us.  We are all prone to soft-pedaling the gospel, only presenting the attractive parts and failing to mention where Christ does not just comfort but also confronts.  And it must confront more than the sins of others. It is far too easy to use the New Gospel as a way to differentiate yourself from all the bad Christians.  This makes you look good and confirms to the non-Christians that the obstacle to their commitment lies with the hypocrisy and failure of others.  There is no talk of repentance or judgment.  There is no hint that Jesus was killed, not so much for his inclusive love as his outrageous Godlike claims (Matt. 26:63-66; 27:39-43).  The New Gospel only talks of salvation in strictly cosmic terms.  In fact, the door is left wide open to imagine that hell, if it even exists, is probably not a big threat for most people.

Why So Wrong?
It shouldn’t be hard to see what is missing in the new gospel.  What’s missing is the old gospel, the one preached by the Apostles, the one defined in 1 Corinthians 15, the one summarized later in The Apostles’ Creed.

“But what you call the New Gospel is not a substitute for the old gospel.  We still believe all that stuff.”

Ok, but why don’t you say it?  And not just privately to your friends or on a statement of faith somewhere, but in public?  You don’t have to be meaner, but you do have to be clearer.  You don’t have to unload the whole truck of systematic theology on someone, but to leave the impression that hell is no big deal is so un-Jesus like (Matt. 10:26-33).  And when you don’t talk about the need for faith and repentance you are very un-apostolic (Acts 2:38; 16:31).

“But we are just building bridges. We are relating to the culture first, speaking in a language they can understand, presenting the parts of the gospel that make the most sense to them. Once we have their trust and attention, then we can disciple and teach them about sin, repentance, faith and all the rest. This is only pre-evangelism.”

Yes, it’s true, we don’t have to start our conversations where we want to end up.  But does the New Gospel really prime the pump for evangelism or just mislead the non-Christian into a false assurance?  It’s one thing to open a door for further conversation.  It’s another to make Christianity so palatable that it sounds like something the non-Christian already does. And this is assuming the best about the New Gospel, that underneath there really is a desire to get the old gospel out.

Paul’s approach with non-Christians in Athens is instructive for us (Acts 17:16-34).  First, Paul is provoked that the city is so full of idols (16).  His preaching is not guided by his disappointment with other Christians, but by his anger over unbelief.  Next, he gets permission to speak (19-20). Paul did not berate people. He spoke to those who were willing to listen.  But then look at what he does.  He makes some cultural connection (22-23, 28), but from there he shows the contrast between the Athenian understanding of God and the way God really is (24-29). His message is not about a way of life, but about worshiping the true God in the right way.  After that, he urges repentance (30), warns of judgment (31), and talks about Jesus’ resurrection (31).

The result is that some mocked (32). Who in the world mocks the New Gospel? There is nothing not to like.  There is no scandal in a message about lame Christians, a loving God, changing the world, and how most of us are most likely not going to hell.  This message will never be mocked, but Paul’s Mars Hill sermon was. And keep in mind, this teaching in Athens was only an entre into the Christian message.  This was just the beginning, after which some wanted to hear him again (32).  Paul said more in his opening salvo than some Christians ever dare to say. We may not be able to say everything Paul said at Athens all at once, but we certainly must not give the impression in our “pre-evangelism” that repentance, judgment, the necessity of faith, the importance of right belief, the centrality of the cross and the resurrection, the sinfulness of sin and the fallenness of man–the stuff that some suggest will be our actual evangelism–are outdated relics of a mean-spirited, hurtful Christianity.

A Final Plea
Please, please, please, if you are enamored with the New Gospel or anything like it, consider if you are really being fair with your fellow Christians in always throwing them under the bus.  Consider if you are preaching like Jesus did, who called people, not first of all to a way of life, but to repent and believe (Mark 1:15).  And as me and my friends consider if we lack the necessary patience and humility to speak tenderly with non-Christians, consider if your God is a lopsided cartoon God who never takes offense at sin (because sin is more than just un-neighborliness) and never pours out wrath (except for the occasional judgment against the judgmental).   Consider if you are giving due attention to the cross and the Lamb of God who died there to take away the sin of the world. Consider if your explanation of the Christian message sounds anything like what we hear from the Apostles in the book of Acts when they engage the world.

This is no small issue. And it is not just a matter of emphasis. The New Gospel will not sustain the church. It cannot change the heart. And it does not save. It is crucial, therefore, that our evangelical schools, camps, conferences, publishing houses, and churches can discern the new gospel from the old.

Print Friendly

Comments:


76 thoughts on “The Gospel Old and New”

  1. David says:

    May have been said somewhere above, read most of the comments but not all. However, it seems to me this “New Gospel”, which my wife and I have been guilty of presenting at times, is born out of a false sense of responsibility to convince others to come to faith. God never laid that burden on us. All he left us with was the preaching of the gospel, “the power of God for the salvation of all who believe”.

  2. Pastor Bob Wheatley says:

    I keep hearing of churches being “missional.” Is that what the third point of the New Gospel is all about? I am sort of an old dinosaur and have not kept up with the new terminology.

  3. Suzette says:

    David, I agree. A false sense of responsibility born out of good intentions. Where is the power of God in the church of America?! Lord, have mercy on us. Humble us and cleanse us so we move out of the way and be empty containers of Your glory.

  4. Philip Griffin says:

    What a helpful article- many thanks. I’m an Anglican Minister in the diocese of Sydney, Australia, where what you dub ‘the new gospel’ is alive and well. Tragically, the church in which I was converted has gone down this path, as have many others.

    Thanks again for a timely warning, written with grace.

  5. Neil King says:

    A truly excellent post, Kevin. I would propose, however, that there is a fifth part to the New Gospel. It is alluded to in the second part where John 3:17 is quoted, with the fifth part being this: a tendency – whether deliberate or not – to quote single verses of Scripture apart from their context. Obviously, this sort of thing isn’t the sole preserve of advocates of the New Gospel, but it is the thing that strikes me the most and concerns me the most.

    What’s more, this isn’t just an indictment on those who preach the New Gospel, but also on those of us who haven’t purposely read all of our Bibles. One of the reasons why the New Gospel has taken such a grip in the church today is because so many Christians are Biblically illiterate and do not have enough of a systematic view of Scripture in order to see what the errors are with the New Gospel.

    Oh, that the Lord would raise up more preachers and pastors who have a passion for the whole counsel of God and are determined to pass that onto those in their care!

  6. EJ says:

    Steve, your opinion doesn’t sound that humble. I’m sorry to hear you believe you way is the only way to travel The Way.

  7. Lindsay Dunstan says:

    Particularly for EJ on the 26/11/09, a careful account Kevin to draw us back to the old Gospel. Human failure and sin needed a drastic solution, the blood of bulls and lambs can never cancel out sin. Strength of will and a disciplined life cannot meet my own standards, let alone God’s – I understand Paul in Romans 7. No, we are who believe the Gospel of Christ are not arrogant, just beggars who have found food, and in telling others it needs to be real food, Lindsay

  8. Mark Myles says:

    I like the “new gospel”…BUT. I agree with you, Kevin, on point #3 about “The New Gospel leads people to believe wrong things without explicitly stating those wrong things” What I see here, however, perhaps is you reacting a little too far in talking about the idea that the gospel causing us to be too judgmental. The fact is that we need to call sin what it is and call people to repentance and state the truths about it (not beat around the bush). I think the “new gospel” beats around the bush & by doing so, we end up with a lot of people who aren’t really sure what they believe and merely defining their faith by what it is not rather than what it is. Make sense?
    I take a strong position FOR the simple, but complete good news of Jesus Christ: God sent Jesus to save us from our sins and we must respond with repentance and faith.

  9. James Bell says:

    Kevin does a fine job in exposing a so-called ‘new gospel’ that is growing is popularity. It is popular because it is a creation of man and therefore pleases the natural man. The unspoken reality is that at the root of this so-called gospel is a hatred of the authority of the Word of God. Kevin states that this new gospel, “…cannot change the heart. And it does not save.” QUESTION: If anyone is preaching a ‘gospel’ like that… or any false gospel– They should be plainly exposed as FALSE TEACHERS and plainly pled with to repent. I am stunned at Kevin’s ‘milk-toast plea’- “Please, please, please… consider if you are really being fair with your fellow Christians…” FELLOW CHRISTIANS? When are we going to face the reality that there are TWO CHURCHES in the world– A harlot system and the Bride of Christ? (Revelation 17-19) When are we going to humbly but boldly expose the false teachers as did the Old Testament Prophets and as did the Apostle Paul? (Galatians 1:6-9) To those who teach a false gospel that does not change hearts nor save– The call of Jesus is repent or else! (Revelation 2-3)

    Grace to all in Christ!
    Jim Bell

  10. This movement was heralded decades ago by C. S. Lewis’ “Mere Christianity.” The last chapter, “The New Men”, describes Lewis’ unorthodox vision of mankind as spiritually evolving; that the first two millenia were mere “teething” of the religion, and that now we are beginning to see more of these lofty people full of the “Christ life”. He mentions people of all creeds, whether Buddhist, Mulsim, etc., as being partakers so long as they are drawn out of themselves into selfless lives of love.

    Read it for yourself. I was jaw dropped then, and I am now, to think of how influential some teachers have been. It’s in the air, it’s so prevalent.

    Thanks for the post.

  11. Dallas says:

    Thank you for cutting through the spin and sophistry

    “The New Gospel leads people to believe wrong things without explicitly stating those wrong things. That is, Christians who espouse the New Gospel feel safe from criticism because they never actually said belief is unimportant, or there is no hell, or that Jesus isn’t the only way, or that God has no wrath, or that there is no need for repentance. These distortions are not explicitly stated, but the New Gospel is presented in such a way that non-believers could, and by design should, come to these conclusions. In other words, the New Gospel allows the non-Christian to hear what he wants, while still providing an out against criticism from other Christians. The preacher of the New Gospel can always say when challenged, “But I never said I don’t believe those things.””

  12. Rob Auld says:

    What a crock.

  13. cfguy says:

    One of the most timeliest posts I have read ever. Thanks Kevin.

  14. ZachMN says:

    I thought I was the only one who saw a problem with these guys. Everyone else seems to love them. Their gospel is just as dangerous as the prosperity gospel…

Comments are closed.

Kevin DeYoung


Kevin DeYoung is senior pastor of University Reformed Church (RCA) in East Lansing, Michigan, near Michigan State University. He and his wife Trisha have six young children. You can follow him on Twitter.

Kevin DeYoung's Books