<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflections on the Church in Great Britain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-26605</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-26605</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but no, it&#039;s not. We each don&#039;t get to define vital theological terms the way we want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but no, it's not. We each don't get to define vital theological terms the way we want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-26604</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-26604</guid>
		<description>LOL...what a joke. It&#039;s an excuse as old as time. Whenever you get caught saying something stupid, just cry &quot;I was misquoted. It was taken out of context.&quot; Poor Mark, he&#039;s always misquoted, always taken out of context and just so darned misunderstood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL...what a joke. It's an excuse as old as time. Whenever you get caught saying something stupid, just cry "I was misquoted. It was taken out of context." Poor Mark, he's always misquoted, always taken out of context and just so darned misunderstood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Recap: 2.4.12 &#124; Marturo</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-23815</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Recap: 2.4.12 &#124; Marturo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 21:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-23815</guid>
		<description>[...] In light of Driscoll&#8217;s recent comments: Reflections on the Church in Great Britain j.mp/y81Frs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In light of Driscoll&#8217;s recent comments: Reflections on the Church in Great Britain j.mp/y81Frs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Driscoll&#8217;s &#8220;Message to Brits&#8221;: A Response &#124; Actavallis</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-22557</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Driscoll&#8217;s &#8220;Message to Brits&#8221;: A Response &#124; Actavallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-22557</guid>
		<description>[...] for Brits. I would firstly point to Don Carson&#8217;s response to Mark Driscoll titled Reflections on the Church in Great Britain. He, with far more eloquence and concision than I could muster, has given a point by point response [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Brits. I would firstly point to Don Carson&#8217;s response to Mark Driscoll titled Reflections on the Church in Great Britain. He, with far more eloquence and concision than I could muster, has given a point by point response [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Links &#124; blog of dan</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-21493</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Links &#124; blog of dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-21493</guid>
		<description>[...] Reflections on the Church in Great Britain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reflections on the Church in Great Britain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Fanboy to Frustrated: A Plea To Mark Driscoll - disciplesnow.org</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-21475</link>
		<dc:creator>From Fanboy to Frustrated: A Plea To Mark Driscoll - disciplesnow.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-21475</guid>
		<description>[...] the truth.&#8221; What does he base this statement on? It&#8217;s not clear, and D.A. Carson has contested this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the truth.&#8221; What does he base this statement on? It&#8217;s not clear, and D.A. Carson has contested this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Fanboy to Frustrated: A Plea To Mark Driscoll &#124; Christ and Pop Culture</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-21457</link>
		<dc:creator>From Fanboy to Frustrated: A Plea To Mark Driscoll &#124; Christ and Pop Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-21457</guid>
		<description>[...] the truth.&#8221; What does he base this statement on? It&#8217;s not clear, and D.A. Carson has contested this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the truth.&#8221; What does he base this statement on? It&#8217;s not clear, and D.A. Carson has contested this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Twombly</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-21355</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Twombly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-21355</guid>
		<description>Paul, helpful words here.  My own attempt could probably use some of the qualifications you add.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, helpful words here.  My own attempt could probably use some of the qualifications you add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Twombly</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-21354</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Twombly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-21354</guid>
		<description>Strange to say Tom Wright &quot;isn&#039;t really a pastor.&quot;  In the Anglican communion, a bishop is the chief pastor of his diocese; he&#039;s not &quot;merely&quot; an administrator.  There are scores of notable preachers among the bishops over the years.  On top of that, Wright was at one time the chaplain of Worcester College at Oxford (a real job!)and then became dean of Lichfield Cathedral, a job as much pastoral as administrative.  In addition, I doubt that few who have heard Tom Wright preach failed to see what a powerful and persuasive proclaimer of the gospel he is.  

This discussion seems to be dealing with the irresolvable tension between &quot;pure church&quot; folks and &quot;wheat and tares&quot; folks.  The New Testament reflects both views. The Apostle Paul embodies both strands: on the one hand, he can tolerate those in Corinth who seem to believe the resurrection has already taken place; on the other hand, he can have a brother tossed out for gross immorality and others cursed for &quot;preaching another gospel.&quot;  There&#039;s elasticity, but it&#039;s far from infinite.  

Elsewhere in the NT,there are mixed congregations with strong lines drawn in extreme cases (as in the Johannine letters).  The offenders in John&#039;s epistles separate themselves; the Elder says they were never really &quot;insiders&quot; to begin with.  He identifies &quot;outsiders&quot; as those who don&#039;t acknowledge &quot;the Son&quot; and who don&#039;t love the brethren.  

I&#039;m sorry I&#039;ve failed to get anyone to engage my point (elsewhere in this thread) that the C of E has clearly &quot;produced&quot; an amazing share of preachers, biblical scholars, and theologians who have enriched the whole body of Christ.  It would be hard to find another denomination (evangelical or mixed) that can equal the impact of Stott,Packer, Lewis, Sayers, Wright, Thiselton, Bauckham,McGrath, and so many more on the Church Universal.  I don&#039;t think this is mere coincidence.  There must be something in the faith and prayer of Ecclesia Anglicana that causes so many to rise to great heights with such devotion and depth.  

In the parables of the kingdom in Matthew 13, the amazing leavening power of God is often invisible to the very end.  Let God (and his angels) be the sorter; those who try to do his job for him often end up in groups where constant strife and division take place.  Too many think of themselves as Mr Valiant-for-the-Truth and end up getting shot or shooting others with &quot;friendly fire.&quot;  The Anglican Communion has its own strife, of course, but up until recently the strong tendency has been to stay together, just as the strong tendency of many Reformed groups has been to split into smaller and  smaller divisions, often separating from those just as conservative and &quot;orthodox&quot; on most points as they.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange to say Tom Wright "isn't really a pastor."  In the Anglican communion, a bishop is the chief pastor of his diocese; he's not "merely" an administrator.  There are scores of notable preachers among the bishops over the years.  On top of that, Wright was at one time the chaplain of Worcester College at Oxford (a real job!)and then became dean of Lichfield Cathedral, a job as much pastoral as administrative.  In addition, I doubt that few who have heard Tom Wright preach failed to see what a powerful and persuasive proclaimer of the gospel he is.  </p>
<p>This discussion seems to be dealing with the irresolvable tension between "pure church" folks and "wheat and tares" folks.  The New Testament reflects both views. The Apostle Paul embodies both strands: on the one hand, he can tolerate those in Corinth who seem to believe the resurrection has already taken place; on the other hand, he can have a brother tossed out for gross immorality and others cursed for "preaching another gospel."  There's elasticity, but it's far from infinite.  </p>
<p>Elsewhere in the NT,there are mixed congregations with strong lines drawn in extreme cases (as in the Johannine letters).  The offenders in John's epistles separate themselves; the Elder says they were never really "insiders" to begin with.  He identifies "outsiders" as those who don't acknowledge "the Son" and who don't love the brethren.  </p>
<p>I'm sorry I've failed to get anyone to engage my point (elsewhere in this thread) that the C of E has clearly "produced" an amazing share of preachers, biblical scholars, and theologians who have enriched the whole body of Christ.  It would be hard to find another denomination (evangelical or mixed) that can equal the impact of Stott,Packer, Lewis, Sayers, Wright, Thiselton, Bauckham,McGrath, and so many more on the Church Universal.  I don't think this is mere coincidence.  There must be something in the faith and prayer of Ecclesia Anglicana that causes so many to rise to great heights with such devotion and depth.  </p>
<p>In the parables of the kingdom in Matthew 13, the amazing leavening power of God is often invisible to the very end.  Let God (and his angels) be the sorter; those who try to do his job for him often end up in groups where constant strife and division take place.  Too many think of themselves as Mr Valiant-for-the-Truth and end up getting shot or shooting others with "friendly fire."  The Anglican Communion has its own strife, of course, but up until recently the strong tendency has been to stay together, just as the strong tendency of many Reformed groups has been to split into smaller and  smaller divisions, often separating from those just as conservative and "orthodox" on most points as they.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeekTruthFromFacts</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/01/29/reflections-on-the-church-in-great-britain/#comment-21350</link>
		<dc:creator>SeekTruthFromFacts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/?p=14989#comment-21350</guid>
		<description>Tom Wright isn&#039;t really a pastor, he a scholar. He&#039;s been a good a bishop, but hasn&#039;t really got any experience of running a church. I don&#039;t think either Carson or Driscoll were thinking about theologians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Wright isn't really a pastor, he a scholar. He's been a good a bishop, but hasn't really got any experience of running a church. I don't think either Carson or Driscoll were thinking about theologians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: thegospelcoalition.org @ 2013-05-21 10:42:44 -->