Douglas Wilson|9:59 PM CT

Reading for Worldviews: Lord of the Rings

Editors' Note: "When you sell a man a book you don't sell him just 12 ounces of paper and ink and glue," novelist Christopher Morley said, "you sell him a whole new life." During the past 50 years more books have been sold than in any other time in history. So what type of life---or, as Abraham Kuyper would say, world-and-life view---are we buying?

As a partial answer to that question, we've asked several Christian thinkers to examine the worldviews presented in the top 10 most-read books. Over the next several weeks we'll present articles on each of the titles. Read the introduction to the series by Louis Markos.

* * * * *

One of the disadvantages we have with books written in our lifetime---as compared with classic books from other eras---is kind of obvious if you stop to think about it. We don't know which ones will be classics. We don't know who to put into the line-up. Other centuries are picking on us unfairly. Those other generations had their dreck too, but almost none of that survived the test of time. Our dreck is still alive and well, and selling briskly. So when we make a comparison, we tend to imagine that the 14th century had a Chaucer on every other corner, while ours has an E. L. James in every Starbucks.

The game is lopsided because all they have to do is put in their first string. We are required to put in anybody from the student body who thinks he might be able to play a little.

But imagine what the test of real time will do to our literature that is not worth preserving. Imagine what it will look like when our century and the last one have that huge neighborhood garage sale, the one where we sell off all our old Book of the Month Club selections at a nickel a box. What will we keep? What will be left over?

I want to argue that The Lord of the Rings will be among the keepers. And schoolchildren several centuries hence will then be able to imagine that the 20th century was a time of literary giants, all of them with a Christian worldview---when there was a Tolkien on every corner.

Not Just Harry Potter for Grown-Ups

I have taught courses in Tolkien (and in Lewis), and whenever you do this the teacher has quite a daunting challenge. If I were to teach a course in George Herbert, or T. S. Eliot, or Shakespeare, I would get students enrolled in the class who were interested and engaged, of course. But with a class on Tolkien, you will invariably get one or more students who have the entire middle section of The Silmarillion memorized. "No, no. Beren and Lúthien went through the Gate after they had put that spell on Carcharoth." The same disadvantage attends any who would write about Tolkien as well. And so I begin this modest discussion, suitably abashed.

Those who dismiss The Lord of the Rings as simply Harry Potter for grown-ups, or as a source of bumper sticker material for aging hippies to put on their Volvos ("Not all those who wander are lost") have really missed the central prophetic vision of the books---a prophetic stance taken against modernity . . . or perhaps what we might want to call mordornity. This is the prophetic element that makes Tolkien's vision a fundamentally Christian one. There are places where I prefer Lewis's Protestant take to Tolkien's Catholicism, obviously, but on this issue Tolkien reflects the ethical perspective of the entire Christian tradition. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.

The Gospel as Power Under

This is the wisdom that acknowledges the small are great, the last are first, the humble are exalted, and the servants are lords. For those who think in carnal categories, power is always power over, and this means that for them the difference between white magic and black magic has to be power over for good ends, and power over for evil ends. But the gospel is power under. Jesus humbled himself in obedience, even to the point of death on a cross, and God has therefore highly exalted him and given him the name that is above every name.

Think of it this way. The council of Elrond determined that they would not be seduced by the concept of total war. They are unalterably opposed to Sauron and his works, and so they decide that they will under no circumstances become Sauron themselves. A ring comes into their possession, and it is a ring that would enable them to overthrow Sauron completely . . . but with a price. They could defeat Sauron by becoming Sauron.

The characters who refuse to use the ring in this way are many---Elrond, Gandalf, Faramir, Galadriel, Sam, and for a very long time, Frodo. Boromir falls prey to the temptation posed by the ring, but it seen by all the rest of them as just that, a temptation that his particular kind of strength was too weak to resist.

At the end of his journey, when Frodo finally succumbed to the power of the ring and put it on, standing on the lip of the crevice going down into Mt. Doom, Sauron was "suddenly aware of him, and . . . the magnitude of his own folly was revealed to him in a blinding flash" (The Return of the King). Sauron has no category for a strategy against him conceived in humility. The idea that someone could come into possession of a ring that would grant universal power to the one who possessed it, and who would then not try to use it as he would use it, had never entered his mind. Indeed, given what kind of mind it was, it could not enter his mind.

A Cruciform Story

C. S. Lewis once pointed out that Tolkien's "ring of power" was not a coded message against the atom bomb, and that the chronology of the writing made such a reconstruction impossible. At the same time, the ring of power is a clarion statement against thoughtless use of every form of right-fisted power---from the crossbow to the bomb.

This is another way of saying that the plot lines in The Lord of the Rings are cruciform. And when this kind of structure is combined with Tolkien's vast learning, painstaking attention to detail, and imagination stocked with tales from everywhere, you have a story for the ages.

We cannot know what the technology will be like two centuries from now. How smart will the phones be? The computers? The weapons? The genetic engineering? We have no idea what sort of device might be used in order to read The Lord of the Rings. We therefore cannot pass down to our great-great-grandchildren any specific instructions concerning such details. But we can pass down wisdom. We can teach them---by handing down stories like this one---that being able to do something doesn't mean that you should.

Douglas Wilson is the minister of Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho. His latest book is Father Hunger (Thomas Nelson) and his debates with Christopher Hitchens are documented in the film Collision.

Categories: Reviews

View Comments (48) Post Comment