One can easily turn that Bible into a law book.

You've just given me the final piece of evidence to prove that the survey was written by Evangelicals, for Evangelicals and that no attempt was likely made to take other denominations into account.

In other words, the survey was borked before it was even conducted.

Um, yeah. I speak to Catholics every (week)day and have done so for at least the past five years. I'm not saying anything that don't acknowledge.

As George Weigel, the biographer of JPII, has said, "The hegemony of the historical-critical method of biblical study has taught two generations of Catholics that the Bible is too complicated for ordinary people to understand: So why read what only savants can grasp? Inept preaching, dissecting the biblical text with historical-critical scalpels or reducing Scripture to a psychology manual, has also been a turnoff to Bible study. "

(http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2012/05/biblical-illiteracy-and-bible-babel/george-weigel)

As it is, the evidence is slowly becoming clear that the survey was skewed somehow, resulting in data that merely reflects a single religious POV rather than usable data. That alone means that the survey was compromised.