zeal

 

Nov

10

2010

Thabiti Anyabwile|8:03 am CT

The Complex Posture of Love
The Complex Posture of Love avatar

From Jonathan Leeman’s The Church and the Surprising Offence of God’s Love: Reintroducing the Doctrines of Church Membership and Discipline (pp. 85-86):

Does God love humanity because of something intrinsically valuable or lovable in us?  Logically, that would be impossible.  He created us, and in his omniscience and sovereignty he wrote down every day of our lives before one of them came to be (Ps. 139:16).  He is the source of everything we have, including every good gift that’s been given since creation (James 1:17).  As such, there is literally nothing that God could behold with affection in us that he did not give us in the first place (cf. 1 Cor. 4:7).  (Can we create anything that our omniscient God did not think of first?)  God loves everyone because God beholds his own handiwork, image, and glory in everyone.  God’s love is God-centered.  When we as humans then love in a God-centered way, we love–as Augustine said–with respect to him, or for his sake.  That means we burn to see his character and glory expressed everywhere–in ourselves, in our friends and family, in our enemies, in creation, in everything.  From the vantage point of creation, God-centered love bears no judgment and draws no boundaries.  It knows only pleasure and delights in the gift of itself.

On the other hand, God’s God-centered love bears a posture that opposes everything that opposes God, just as you and I will oppose anyone who opposes the human objects of our love such as a friend or spouse.  I love my daughters, so I have an affection for their good.  How then can I not oppose anyone or anything that intends for their ultimate ill?  So it is with God’s love for God, and so it is for any true love of God that we have.  Loving him means having affection for his glory and honor.  A complex posture is therefore required.  God loves all sinners insofar as they reflect his glory; he opposes them insofar as they don’t.  What that means is that a God-centered love must discriminate; it must have preferences; it must make judgments, and it must do so in light of sin and the fall.  It is not universal, because it does not love anything that opposes God.  God-centered love does not love sin.  What is sin?  Sin is anything that opposes God and intends God’s ultimate ill.  Therefore, God’s God-centered love will discriminate between that which is sin and that which is not; between those who belong to sin and those who do not; between those who love him and seek his glory and those who do not.

God’s love is for everything that glorifies God.  God’s love is against everything that opposes His glory.  Both His being for and His being against are love because both make much of the supreme Object of all possible exultation: God himself.

If we love this way, then we do everything to posture ourselves to magnify God’s glory in Christ.  As Leeman puts it, “we burn to see his character and glory expressed everywhere–in ourselves, in our friends and family, in our enemies, in creation, in everything.”

Are you burning to see God’s character and glory expressed everywhere?

| Printable Version

 
 
 

Sep

21

2010

Thabiti Anyabwile|2:08 pm CT

The Key to Radical Living for Jesus
The Key to Radical Living for Jesus avatar

From David Platt’s Radical: Taking Back Your Faith from the American Dream:

John Paton, Jim Elliot, and C.T. Studd all illustrate one fundamental truth: your life is free to be radical when you see death as reward.  This is the essence of what Jesus taught in Matthew 10, and I believe it is the key to taking back your faith from the American dream.

The key is realizing–and believing–that this world is not your home.  If you and I ever hope to free our lives from worldly desires, worldly thinking, worldly pleasures, worldly dreams, worldly ideals, worldly values, worldly ambitions, and worldly acclaim, then we must focus our lives on another world.  Though you and I live in the United States of America now, we must fix our attention on “a better country–a heavenly one.”  though you and I find ourselves surrounded by the lure of temporary pleasure, we must fasten our affections on the one who promises eternal treasure that will never spoil or fade.  If your life or my life is going to count on earth, we must start by concentrating on heaven.  For then, and only then, will you and I be free to take radical risks, knowing that what awaits us is radical reward.

Seems to me this is not only the key to taking our faith back from the American dream, but also the Caymanian dream, the British dream, the Canadian dream, the French dream, and every other dream that keeps us asleep in the comforts of this life.  Thanks, David, for giving us all a rough shake to wake us from this world’s dreams.

| Printable Version

 
 
 

Mar

02

2010

Thabiti Anyabwile|10:42 am CT

Why Do Pastors Get Lazy?
Why Do Pastors Get Lazy? avatar

From Carl Trueman at Ref 21:

As William Willimon puts it in his superb book, Proclamation and Theology, page 72:

`I believe the roots of clerical sloth are theological rather than primarily psychological.  We become lazy and slovenly in our work because we have lost the theological rationale for the work.’

| Printable Version

 
 
 

Jan

04

2010

Thabiti Anyabwile|9:27 am CT

I’m Thrilled It’s the First Monday in the New Year!
I’m Thrilled It’s the First Monday in the New Year! avatar

Why?

Because I get to get back to work!  I love what I do, Who I do it for, the people I do it with, and the hope of eternal reward after the doing.  What’s not to love about the privilege of serving in pastoral ministry?

And I want to be wary of a heart that’s slothful or sluggish or lazy.  I want to be wary of a dullness toward pastoral ministry that takes me off mission.

The words of Thomas Boston at the conclusion of The Art of Manfishing seem appropriate at the beginning of a new year:

You know not when your Master will come.  And blessed is that servant whom, when his Lord shall come, he shall find so doing. If Christ should come and find you idle, when he is calling you to work, how will you be able to look him in the face?  They are well that die at Christ’s work.

“They are well that die at Christ’s work.”  Amen.

Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, the apostle Peter could assure, “when the Chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory.”  He writes this to those he calls to “shepherd the flock of God that is among you, exercising oversight, not under compulsion, but willingly, as God would have you…” (1 Pet. 5:2, 4).

Onward brothers into the labor!  With a new year give new zeal to the task as we await our Savior!  Be thrilled to be back at the plow!

| Printable Version

 
 
 

Jul

16

2009

Thabiti Anyabwile|4:21 pm CT

Business and Religion
Business and Religion avatar

Dr. Frances J. Grimke:

“A man should carry his religion into his business, and his business into his religion. He should run his business in accordance with the principles of his religion, and he should be business-like in his religion. The same promptness, efficiency, the same energy and earnestness that he shows in his business should also be carried into his religion. in other words, we should be thoroughly religious in all our business relations, and thoroughly business-like in all our religious relations.”

What do you think?

I suspect that most people wouldn’t dispute the first half–take Christ with you into business. But the second half? Bring a business-like approach to religion?

Obviously there are ways that business and a business-model-mindset have affected the church, turning pastors into CEO, members into shareholders, and the church into a marketing machine looking for a niche. So, we lament those things. But I wonder if there isn’t the need in our church lives for “the same promptness, efficiency, the same energy and earnestness” that would define most of us in our secular employment?

Are we more diligent when we’re working for earthly employers than we are when working for the Lord?

| Printable Version

 
 
 

Nov

22

2008

Thabiti Anyabwile|4:00 pm CT

Looking for a Good Time to Coast?
Looking for a Good Time to Coast? avatar

Oh, Lord, keep me from suffocating in comfort and coasting toward insignificance! Give me the zeal of Phineas and the radically cross-consumed vision of Paul! Don’t let me coast and rust out! Please.

HT: Unashamed Workman

| Printable Version

 
 
 

Nov

02

2007

Thabiti Anyabwile|9:13 am CT

Finding Reliable Men: Mature and Humble
Finding Reliable Men: Mature and Humble avatar

You ever heard the phrase “the zeal of a new convert”? It’s used to describe someone who is fervent and boiling over with enthusiasm because of their newfound beliefs or commitments. It’s a bit of a cliche, but it’s a helpful description of recent initiates. New converts tend to have a great deal of energy and enthusiasm, they’re bright-eyed and bushy-tailed (to use another cliche) but not according to knowledge.

The Lord’s next requirement for those who would lead His church as under-shepherds is that “He must not be a recent convert, or he may become puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil” (1 Tim. 3:6).

The apostle gives us both the qualification and the rationale.

The Qualification

“He must not be a recent convert.” That is, the elder must not be a new believer. Literally, he must not be “newly planted” in the faith. Like a tender shoot, he will be unable to withstand the steady trodding and sometimes trampling that comes with pastoral ministry. His faith must not be new but aged, like a mature vine that produces ripe fruit.

New believers are like new children, the freshness of new life encourages and excites us but there must be the recognition that they are vulnerable. Their lack of maturity requires that time be taken to instruct, shape and care for them. Because they need such care, they are not themselves sufficiently equipped to provide pastoral level care to others.

It’s good of the Lord to tell us this in His word, and good for the church to heed it. The tendency in some churches, particularly those eager to get people “plugged in” or involved in ministry, will sometimes be to take new converts and press them into service wherever there appears an interest or a need. When we do that, whether it is the eldership or children’s ministry or the praise team, we open ourselves to making two mistakes: (1) placing the person in a service setting beyond their ability (even teaching children, if we’re doing more than “baby sitting” for a couple hours, requires good facility in the basics of the faith), and (2) neglecting the more needful care and instruction we should be giving the new convert.

So, while Paul raises this issue especially with elders, it may be prudent to apply this more broadly in the church by encouraging new converts and members to complete appropriate theological and ministry training before involving them in a particular area of service, or by encouraging them to take the first six months of their membership and focus primarily on learning and building relationships in the church. But back to eldership….

The potential elder is not to be a recent convert to the faith. There will be much that he needs to learn, apply, and master in his own life (Rom. 12:1-2) before he can begin to disciple and shepherd others in this way. Paul does not give us an age requirement or some length of time that automatically signals maturity. We all know Christians who have been Christians for decades but probably lack the spiritual maturity requisite for the eldership. And conversely, we’ve probably me a number of people who spiritually were “born old” and evidence remarkable maturity for their “Christian age.” Patient discernment is needed. What we would like to see is consistent maturity in life and thought over time.

The Rationale

And we would be wise to search for maturity because of the particular danger that attaches itself to the office. The word of God says an immature man “may become puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil.” Pride and demonic condemnation. Two very dangerous spiritual foes await the novice. Someone unable to handle the mantle of leadership as “servant of all” may be given to lofty thoughts of himself. And that pride will affect how he handles others, perhaps leading to harsh treatment of the sheep and unwillingness to follow leadership himself. Ultimately, such a novice is vulnerable to falling in the office, leading to “the condemnation of the devil.” That condemnation could either be interpreted as the same judgment the devil received for his pride or the slander and accusation of the devil, who stands ready to accuse the brethren. Either way, to invite a novice to the office of elder is to invite him to onslaughts from within (pride) and without (judgment).

Calvin summarizes well: “novices have not only impetuous fervour and bold daring, but are also puffed up with foolish confidence, as if they could fly beyond the clouds. Consequently, it is not without reason that they are excluded from the honour of a bishopric, till, in process of time, their proud temper shall be subdued.”

Some Observations and Questions

1. When was the man converted? Is the potential elder a new Christian? If so, he is not qualified for the post. He may be a man with great zeal and desire to serve, but it’s better to disciple and train him for a life of godliness and push into the future of maturity considerations for eldership.

2. What is the man’s level of spiritual maturity, even if he were converted some time ago? By spiritual maturity, we mustn’t think age or number of years as a Christian. Does the man demonstrate Spirit-filled living, bearing the fruit of the Spirit (Gal. 5)? Does he respond with kindness, patience, and compassion in varying situations? Does he meet the qualifications previously stated (sober, etc.)? Is he a young man with maturity beyond his years? Such a man should be considered as long as he is mature.

3. To what extent is the man given to pride? Pride is an enemy to us all. It has many faces and forms. But to what extent is a man aware of his pride? Does he act proudly and appear blind to it? Or, does he fight his pride like a Christian, making his life open to and submitted to others? Will the office of elder tempt him to arrogance and exalting himself over others? Consider the man’s leadership experiences in other places. Does he evidence pride in those settings? Would his employees or coworkers regard him as a humble or a puffed up man?

4. One measure of pride might be over-confidence in the face of spiritual temptations and dangers. Warned about the accusation and temptations of the evil one peculiar to the eldership, does he show godly concern or too much sureness of his own ability and strength? Or, is he gripped with a sense of his own inadequacy (2 Cor. 2:16) and need for God’s spiritual protection? Blindness to our need for spiritual protection and vigilance in watching our lives most certainly leads to dullness of heart and rests on the pride off self-confidence.

5. Is the man sensitive to critique and criticism? Certainly not every criticism a person receives is accurate or warranted. But how will we know whether a criticism is accurate or unjust if we refuse to consider them in the first place? Is the prospective elder prone to knee-jerk defenses and rationalizations in the face of critique and criticism? Does he interpret every disagreement as opposition? Pride sometimes manifests itself in an “untouchable” attitude toward the critique, criticism and even slander of others. But a humble, poor in spirit attitude will prayerfully consider such comments an opportunity for reflection and growth.

6. It might be helpful to ask the man and others if he is able to submit to the opinion of others (especially other elders) even when he holds a different opinion. Can he submit to others when he disagrees? Can he recognize that the other elders are biblically qualified, gifted, and Spirit-filled men who may hold a different opinion?

In looking for reliable men, in endeavoring to be reliable pastors, we can not afford to minimize the importance of spiritual maturity and humility.

| Printable Version

 
 
 

May

22

2007

Thabiti Anyabwile|11:13 am CT

How Zealous Are We for the Honor of Our God?
How Zealous Are We for the Honor of Our God? avatar

One of the most striking passages in Scripture–among many, many that could be named–is Numbers 25. (I’ll wait while you dig that one up and refresh your memory :-) ).

In Numbers 25 Israel is in the land of Shittim. They’ve just been protected by God from Balak’s attempts to convince Balaam to curse Israel (chps 22-24). Rather than curse Israel, the prophet is forced to speak only what the Lord says, and the Lord blesses His people repeatedly in these three chapters.

But in Num. 25, Israel is found committing sexual immorality with Moabite women and sacrificing to their gods. The contrast is stunning. God is faithful to preserve His people from their enemies, and His people go whoring after false gods, including sexual immorality.

For their sin, the Lord’s anger burns and He commands Moses to have the leaders of this idolatry killed and exposed in broad daylight. While Moses is instructing the judges of Israel to carry out God’s judgment, an Israelite brings a Midianite woman into his tent, “right before the eyes of Moses and whole assembly of Israel while they were weeping at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting. Another striking contrast. The Israel of God is gathered together weeping over their sins before the Tent of Meeting. And this man, brazen and indifferent, brings a woman into his family tent for all to see through weeping eyes.

Then the jarring part. “When Phinehas son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron, the priest, saw this, he left the assembly, took a spear in his hand and followed the Israelite into the tent. He drove the spear through both of them–through the Israelite and into the woman’s body” (25:7-8). Following Phinehas’ action, the plague that killed 24,000 was stopped.

Now the more jarring part. Verse 10: “The Lord said to Moses, ‘Phinehas son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron, the priest, has turned my anger away from the Israelites; for he was as zealous as I am for my honor among them….”

How zealous are we for the honor of our God?

Would we have done what Phinehas does?

When was the last time we gathered as God’s people and wept before God over the sins of His people as Moses and Israel did here?

Does Phinehas appear to us a wild-eyed religious radical?

Does his action seem extreme, impulsive, perhaps self-righteous?

Do we think that Phinehas’ action here is unloving, perhaps cruel?

Does it seem to us that length of human life is more important than the honor due to God?

Have we been thinking that anyone who calls her or himself a “Christian,” who is pleased to attend our churches, has a right to our unending patience even when in clear, unrepentant sin?

Who do we identify with most in the account: the Midianite woman and Israelite man committing adultery, Phinehas with spear in hand, or Moses interceding in prayer?

Christ Jesus our Savior has, in His body on the tree, been pierced for our transgressions. He has bore the spear thrust due to us for our adulteries, physical and spiritual. By His wounds we have been healed.

But are we zealous for His honor? Does knowledge of our sin that placed Christ on that tree work in us a righteous indignation toward sin?

We are not Phinehas; we are not gathered together before the Tent of Meeting in a developing theocracy. But are we to be more or less zealous than Phinehas for God’s honor? And if we are zealous, what is the appropriate standard against which to measure our zeal?

Verse 10 commends Phinehas for being as zealous for the honor of God as God himself is. That’s our standard. How zealous was God for His honor? Enough to pierce His own Son to satisfy His wrath against the sins of His people. It’s in the broken body and shed blood of the Perfectly Righteous Christ that we get an estimation of the honor due to God. The blood of bulls and goats will not do. Though Phinehas is said to have made atonement for the Israelites (v. 13), neither will the blood of offending people do. Only the blood of Christ–sinless, powerful, cleansing–will honor God the way He deserves. And in the shedding of the blood of Christ, we have answers to our questions.

How zealous are we for the honor of our God? We should be so zealous as to proclaim and live by the fact that the sinless Son of God came into the world to take the “spear” of nails on Calvary’s cross. We should be so zealous as to make the proclamation of the death and resurrection of Christ our constant and passionate vocation. We must mortify the deeds of the flesh–not by javelin–but by turning again and again to those nails and those boards and that Savior who died on them.

When was the last time we gathered as God’s people and wept before God over the sins of His people as Moses and Israel did here? Should this not be weekly? Should we not daily even cry over the sins of our brethren in our midst, and intercede for each other more often than we do? Our coming to the Lord’s Table should, in part, be a time of weeping for those who knew our fellowship and are now lost to us. Our hearing of the gospel should bring to mind those deceived by sin, who have tasted the glories of heaven but are not entangled with the world and the enemy. We should be zealous enough for the honor of God to weep for the lost and the apostate and those held by sin’s grip.

Does Phinehas appear to us a wild-eyed religious radical? Does his action seem extreme, impulsive, perhaps self-righteous? Do we think that Phinehas’ action here is unloving, perhaps cruel? If this is the case with us, perhaps we’ve not been thinking clearly enough about the fact that God will finally declare an end to rebellion. He will finally crush the serpent’s head and call the birds to feed on the carcasses of the enemy’s army. It is the most loving thing in the world to call people to stop their abuses of God’s patience and to turn from sin. It is good for us to deny people even the opportunity to sin if it’s within our ability. And certainly, it’s loving for us to leave our knees weeping before God to stop the self-destructing sin in our midst that dishonors God to pierce through with the gospel and the demands of the gospel those who come into the camp committed to sin.

Does it seem to us that length of human life is more important than the honor due to God? If so, we will be more zealous for “life,” which is really spiritual death, than we will for the honor of God. I once heard someone say “God cares more about the quality of your life than the length of your life.” I think that’s true; it’s at least implicit in the judgment “the day you eat of this fruit you shall surely die.” Is it not our tendency at times to “prolong a life,” to in effect coddle a sin, by failing to swiftly and decisively and lovingly confront an erring brother, to pass over the Midianite in the tent by saying something like “I’ll pray for you” rather than open the word of God which pierces and divides.

Have we been thinking that anyone who calls her or himself a “Christian,” who is pleased to attend our churches, has a right to our unending patience even when in clear, unrepentant sin? If we do not lovingly confront those in sin or error, if we do not disciple others, if we do not attempt to restore our brothers, if we fail to see our responsibility to participate in the corrective discipline of our churches… we have perhaps valued “patience” more than the honor of God.

Oh for more zeal for the honor of Christ our God, to be as zealous for God’s honor as God himself is!

| Printable Version