Monthly Archives: October 2007

 

Oct

23

2007

Trevin Wax|3:25 am CT

The Best of Kingdom People: 16-20
The Best of Kingdom People: 16-20 avatar

Kingdom People turns 1 this week. In celebration, I am counting down the 25 most visited Kingdom People posts.

 

#16. The Baptist Diocese

March 15, 2007

In this article, I asked some tough ecclesiological questions regarding the recent move of some mega-churches to multi-site campuses. Since publishing this article, I have spoken with respected church leaders about my concerns. The answers I have received have only caused me more concern regarding the direction of the multi-site movement.

 

#17. Bruchko: The Story of Bruce Olson

December 28, 2006

This is the first of a two-part review of Bruce Olson’s autobiography, a fascinating missionary story that took Olson into one of the most violent South American tribes.

 

#18. Derek Webb and the Gospel of the Kingdom

August 15, 2007

Tony Kummer and I had the privilege of doing a SaidatSouthern podcast with Derek Webb. Shortly after the release of Part 1, a controversy erupted over Webb’s definition of “the gospel.” I came to Webb’s defense by showing how the New Testament writers spoke of “the gospel” and pleading for grace, instead of nitpickiness (is that a word?).

 

#19. Don’t Tell Me N.T. Wright Denies Penal Substitution

April 24, 2007

This is one of the posts I put the most work into (because it was originally an essay for my Systematic Theology class). In it, I lay out the view of N.T. Wright regarding the penal substitutionary model of the atonement. I have said it before and I will say it again: My stampeding theoblogian friends, be cautious when attacking people. Read authors well before you start disagreeing with them.

 

#20. The True Scandal in Warren/Obama Controversy

December 22, 2006

Put the words “Warren,” “Obama,” “scandal” and “controversy” into one title, and you’re bound to bring in some traffic from search engines. That’s what I learned, anyway, when I posted this article on Rick Warren inviting Barack Obama to speak at a conference. What is the true scandal? You’ll have to read the post to find out!

 

CONTINUE (Posts 11-15)

 
 

Oct

22

2007

Trevin Wax|3:25 am CT

The Best of Kingdom People: 21-25
The Best of Kingdom People: 21-25 avatar

One year ago this week, my old blog (Red Letters) morphed into the current one: Kingdom People. Since the switch, I have watched the audience for this blog grow. It is humbling to me (as well as a weighty responsibility!) to know that hundreds of people find this site worthy of their attention every day.

 

In the blog world, posts come quickly and disappear just as fast. For those of you who may be new subscribers to Kingdom People, I hope that this week will introduce you to some of the top posts from the previous year.

 

All this week, I plan on counting down the 25 most visited Kingdom People posts. These are not necessarily the posts I would choose as my very favorites. But they are however the posts that have enjoyed the most “hits” over the past year. 

 

I’ll post links to 5 archived posts each day. I hope you enjoy “The Best of Kingdom People.” (Note to my blogger friends: I’d love to see some other blogs do this too.)

 

#21. My Favorite Reads of 2006: Top Ten Books
December 26, 2006

In 2006, I managed to read 86 books covering a wide range of topics. At the end of the year, I posted my ten favorite “reads” of the year. (This is not a blanket endorsement of these books, only that I thoroughly enjoyed each of them and found them helpful.) Several other bloggers linked to his post. Those links and the traffic from search engines made this one of the more popular posts during the early months of 2007.

 

#22. John Piper on the Prosperity Gospel
June 16, 2007

This brief video clip of John Piper preaching against the “prosperity gospel” elicited some good feedback and became the starting point for an interesting discussion about the nature of gospel blessings.

 

#23. Baptist Press Article on Paul Negrut and Plagiarism

March 5, 2007

This post included the Baptist Press article that quoted me at length regarding the plagiarism charges leveled against Emanuel University president Paul Negrut.

 

#24. God is Jesus

March 1, 2007

A post with a provocative title, but one that brought me some good feedback.

 

#25. Amazing Version of O Holy Night 

December 3, 2006

This YouTube video features David Phelps in one of the most incredible vocal performances of “O Holy Night” that I’ve heard. Around Christmastime, this post was bringing in dozens of hits a day.

 

CONTINUE… (Posts 16-20)

 
 

Oct

21

2007

Trevin Wax|3:12 am CT

Mary's Prayer
Mary's Prayer avatar

nativity1.jpg

My soul magnifies the Lord,
and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior,
for he has looked on the humble estate of his servant.

For behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed;
for he who is mighty has done great things for me,
and holy is his name.
And his mercy is for those who fear him
from generation to generation.

He has shown strength with his arm;
he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts;
he has brought down the mighty from their thrones
and exalted those of humble estate;
he has filled the hungry with good things,
and the rich he has sent empty away.

He has helped his servant Israel,
and in remembrance of his mercy,
as he spoke to our fathers,
to Abraham, and to his offspring forever.

 
 

Oct

20

2007

Trevin Wax|3:44 am CT

How God Called Me to Romania
How God Called Me to Romania avatar

post060830_sunset_in_tismana_romania.jpg

Earlier this week, I recounted the first part of my experience of being called to Romania in 2000, including my feeling that God had tricked me. Many have asked me what was the defining moment that confirmed for me that God wanted me to move to Romania. That story is below…

In March 2000, I went back to Romania for a brief visit to the campus of the university I was thinking about attending. Emanuel University had begun shortly after the Communist regime fell in Romania. The university had several major programs, the most prominent being a Bachelor’s Degree in Pastoral Theology. The university existed to train young people to do God’s work in Romania.

I visited the campus of Emanuel University, intending to discover if it were God’s will for me to move to Romania for the next five years. I met many foreign students that week, mostly from Moldova, Russia, and the Ukraine. There had never been a student from the United States before, so I was fully aware that I would be charting new ground and hiking through unknown territory, without the benefit of having someone who had gone before me to help me on the way.

Many people asked me later when God’s will first became clear for me during that week. Looking over my journal now, I notice that the first few days feature the phrase “if I come here.” Towards the end of the journal, that phrase reappears, now tweaked slightly to “when I come here.” At some point during my time at Emanuel that week, I knew in my heart that Romania would be my home for the next five years.

My crucial moment of realization can be traced back to the actions of a handful of students who took the initiative to clean the ditches outside the campus gate. During my five years in Romania, I crossed the walkway over that ditch almost every day. Most of the time, it was teeming with trash and mud, and the litter sometimes turned into a dark, oozing oil. In the summer, the stench from the trash could be almost unbearable.

It surprised me that a group of students had decided to clean out the ditch. The task would be dirty and toilsome. But the students were determined. Their willingness to serve moved me, as they tackled a thankless job that no one else would do and worked at it with all their hearts, without expecting payment.

I remember people passing by on the street and seeing us doing the unthinkable. We heard the same question repeatedly: “Why are you doing this?” The students happily responded by sharing the Gospel message of salvation and restoration.

Cleaning up our world is not only a spiritual task; it’s physical as well. Meeting students willing to do the dirty work of making the world a better place was one of the deciding factors that influenced me to go to Emanuel.

I also realized that by moving to Romania, I would have the chance to answer the same question they did. People would inevitably ask me, “Why are you doing this?” Though it seemed crazy and backwards to move to a third-world country to study, I knew this was what God wanted me to do.

Eventually, I came to understand why God had first called me to Cedarville. He had led me to Cedarville precisely because the price was high. This ensured that I would take a year off between high school and college, which meant He would have another year in which to form me for the ministry for which He was preparing me. God had not called me directly to Romania (the thought in high school would have scared me). Instead, He had called me first to Cedarville, only to then lead me to Emanuel.

The way God worked in my life taught me a life lesson. God’s ways are higher than our ways. We don’t always understand the portrait He’s painting. He might lead us somewhere in order to take us somewhere totally different. The important thing is to be ready to submit, depending on His guidance for each step.

The decision had been made. The hard part was over, so I thought. I was moving to Romania. The difficulties, however, were just about to begin.

written by Trevin Wax  © 2007 Kingdom People blog

 
 

Oct

20

2007

Trevin Wax|3:11 am CT

The City of God
The City of God avatar

“The City of God is a place where the inhabitants love people and walk on gold; the city of man is a place where the inhabitants love gold and walk on people.”

- St. Augustine

 
 

Oct

19

2007

Trevin Wax|3:01 am CT

In the Blogosphere…
In the Blogosphere… avatar

Are you a slothful book reviewer?

Piper on divorce: Jesus is radical. Don’t try to tame him.

Make sure that if you leave a church, you’re not committing ecclesial adultery.

A biblical perspective on cutting.

Tullian gives some ideas on identifying reliable carriers of God’s Word.

Joseph has some fine thoughts on the Lord’s Supper and assurance.

J.D. Greear lists some pertinent questions from the book Practicing Greatness.

Top Post this Week at Kingdom People: My Letter to Bill O’Reilly Regarding the Desecration of the Sacrament

Next week, I am taking a well-deserved blogging break. Kingdom People is turning 1, so instead of a new post everyday, I’m planning on counting down the top 25 most-visited posts at Kingdom People during the past year. If you’re new to this blog, I hope this will be a cool way to read some of what has gone before.

 
 

Oct

18

2007

Trevin Wax|11:07 am CT

Lessons from Doug Pagitt's Backstage Conversation
Lessons from Doug Pagitt's Backstage Conversation avatar

The blogosphere has been filled with commentary regarding Emerging Church leader Doug Pagitt and evangelical pastor John MacArthur’s televised discussion on whether or not Christianity and Yoga are compatible. If you haven’t seen the video, you can watch it below.

Since the debate, a recorded conversation between Doug and one of the workers in the studio has surfaced and has been spreading throughout the blogosphere, primarily because of Doug’s scoffing attitude towards John MacArthur. A personal letter from Doug to someone else claimed MacArthur was preaching a “perverted” gospel. (Doug sounds more and more like his fundamentalist enemies every day.) 

But let’s return to Doug’s backstage conversation with this lady. After you read transcript of their conversation found below, check out the three lessons I believe we can learn from this conversation.

Pagitt: Yeah, yeah,…well, you’re sure welcome. Ok, so was it on live too, and then be re-aired? Huh; yeah, that’s great. Thanks. Bye-bye.
Woman: [Way to] go.
Pagitt: Well, thanks. It’s just so weird, isn’t it? [background, "Yes."] To hear people say stuff like that, like what he’s saying?
Woman: [unintelligible] the reason why younger people don’t go to church. You know what I mean?
Pagitt: I do.
Woman: Because everything is so black and white. You know a position has nothing to do with your body and your spiritual th-you kidding me? [Pagitt snickers in the background] Seriously.
Pagitt: Seriously, [mockingly] “if you want to relieve stress go to the Word of God.” [chuckles]
Woman: Yeah.
Pagitt: [snickering] Oh my goodness.
Woman: It’s like, that’s totally separate; how can you even-ah.
Pagitt: Ah, I don’t know; I…
Woman: I’m glad they have you.
Pagitt: Thanks. Thanks, I apologize for him. [laughs]. Ah…
Woman: [sighs] Well, maybe since that was such a nice conversation, they didn’t give us a lot of time, maybe we can see you again-
Pagitt: Maybe we’ll do it again sometime. Wouldn’t that be fun.
Woman: I got your recording so they did go live with it.
Pagitt: Well, that’s nice.
Woman: That’s here… [unintelligible] you have a DVD-
Pagitt: I have a DVD player. Now my phone should start ringing. All my quirky friends calling me.
Woman: “I saw you…”
Pagitt: “You were pathetic.”
Woman: [laughing]
Pagitt: “I told you to sit up.” I can hear it now.
Woman: No, you were great.
Pagitt: Well, thanks.
Woman: And you didn’t sound crazy either.
Pagitt: [laughing] Thanks.
Woman: Like tha’ other guy. But then you get to watch it again, so…
Pagitt: Yeah, watch it over and over.
Woman: An’ wanna make more copies.
Pagitt: Thanks.
Woman: It was cool to meet you.
Pagitt: Yeah, thank you. Good to know you.
Woman: Yeah.
Pagitt: Should I leave the tag with you.
Woman: I’ll take it for ya. Is it easy for you to go out that way?
Pagitt: Go out that door? Yeah, because I’m parked across the street.
Woman: Oh, cool.
Pagitt: Ok.
Woman: Alright, you have a good day.
Pagitt: Thanks so much.

I’m not interested in starting a debate over yoga. If you want to debate that, find some other blog and have at it. I have serious concerns about incorporating Hindu practices into the Christian’s life when syncretism is already a societal temptation for many. But I’m not going to get all hot over it and condemn brothers and sisters who feel differently.

So… leaving the yoga issue aside, let’s look at three revealing aspects of Doug’s backstage conversation.

LESSON #1: Don’t apologize for other believers.

Apologizing for John MacArthur? Do I need to say more? Regardless of whether or not you like his tone, MacArthur has faithfully pastored a church for many years, seen many people come to faith in Christ, and musters up the courage to speak the truth, boldly, wherever he is.

LESSON #2: Don’t Scoff at the idea of God’s Word being a Help

Other bloggers have jumped on Doug’s scoffing sarcasm regarding the idea that the Bible can help relieve stress. I’m not going to rehash that. Let’s just take it as a lesson to learn and leave it for now.

LESSON #3: Open your eyes to the evangelistic opportunities around you!

For me, this is the biggest strike against Pagitt’s discussion with the lady backstage. Forget for a moment his stance on yoga, his open derision of John MacArthur and his sarcasm regarding the Bible. What is really amazing is Doug’s failure to make the connections with a woman who was wide open to hearing the gospel!

How many avenues did she need to open up before he would realize she was intrigued and wanted to hear more? Doug could have used her comment about why people don’t go to church as a spring board to other questions about her community of faith, if she has any. He could have asked her what her personal beliefs are. What is her spiritual background? What does she think about Jesus?

She hinted that she’d like to have a good conversation with him some other time. But he doesn’t get her name. He doesn’t follow up. He just hands her his pass and walks out the door. (Maybe he did this earlier… if he did, my apologies!)

I’m not saying that Doug needed to present the gospel message in a three-minute soundbite here. But this woman was obviously open to continuing the discussion. In fact, she was the one initiating the spiritual discussion.

We who have been participating in the EC dialogue for several years can benefit from some of the missiological insights of the movement, take some of the movement’s healthy critique of modernism, and learn from the movement’s emphasis on narrative.

Yes, there are negative parts of the EC. But those parts of the Emerging Church doesn’t worry me too much. I’ve come to realize that, though the movement gets a lot of press, it’s not going to be around forever. Many of the EC guys just don’t have a gospel to share. They’re not reproducing themselves. They’re not making disciples, only making already-disgruntled Christians even more disgruntled.

written by Trevin Wax  © 2007 Kingdom People blog

 
 

Oct

18

2007

Trevin Wax|3:28 am CT

You Were Made for Earth: My Interview with Michael Wittmer
You Were Made for Earth: My Interview with Michael Wittmer avatar

Dr. Michael Wittmer, the author of Heaven is a Place on Earth: Why Everything You Do Matters to God. Michael is associate professor of systematic theology at Grand Rapids Theological Seminary, where he has taught since 1996. I highly recommend his book as a great introduction into the Christian worldview.

In Heaven is a Place on Earth, you write that humans were created, not for heaven, but for earth. Why would most Christians believe this is the other way around?

Michael Wittmer: Christians who believe that the goal of life is to escape this world and go to heaven typically make two theological mistakes. First, they fail to recognize that the Bible is a unified story of creation, fall, and redemption, and, like all good stories, should be read from left to right. When we begin with creation, we quickly realize that redemption aims to restore creation rather than annihilate it, which is why Scripture often speaks of the earth, not some ethereal heaven, as our ultimate home.

Second, many Christians confuse ontological (literal) with ethical categories. When 1 Peter 2:11 says that we are strangers in this world, they think Peter means that we do not belong here—that Planet Earth is not our true home. But if they read the whole verse, they would notice that Peter is using the terms “stranger” and “alien” in an ethical way, to warn us to “abstain from fleshly lusts.”

Ontologically speaking, this world is our home. We are earthlings, for heaven’s sake! But ethically, the sin in this world should drive us nuts. We must keep this difference straight in our minds, or we will never understand Scripture and God’s purpose for our lives.

Where did this confusion come from?

Michael Wittmer: Historically, the idea that we come from heaven and will return there was espoused by Plato. This notion was passed on to the church by Augustine, who was a Neoplatonist before his conversion. Since Augustine is the church’s most important theologian, many Christians in the Middle Ages assumed his Platonic view of reality. Combined with the dualism present in classical dispensationalism between Israel and the Church and earth and heaven, it is no wonder that many Christians believe the best they can hope for is to go to heaven when they die.

How does developing a Christian worldview help us avoid the dualistic thinking found in so many churches today?

Michael Wittmer: The story of Scripture is simply this:

Creation—everything God made is good;
Fall—everything has been broken by sin;
Redemption—everything must be restored to its original goodness.

The obvious point of this story is that everything matters to God. Grace must restore everything that sin has destroyed. So every part of our lives and every part of our world must be brought under the lordship of Christ.

In the words of Abraham Kuyper,

“There is not one square inch in the whole domain of human existence over which Jesus Christ, who is Lord of all, does not exclaim, ‘It’s Mine!’”

So whether we are making a meal, tending our lawn, playing with children, or going to work, it all matters now. God cares just as much about what we watch on television as he does about what we do in church. Why? Because every aspect of creation must be redeemed.

How do humans reflect the image of their Maker?

Michael Wittmer: The image of God is a tantalizing, mysterious concept to nail down. It is a rich, provocative idea that overflows any borders we might assign to it. Still, I have found it helpful to think about the image of God in ontological and ethical categories.

Ontologically, our beings reflect God in our higher capacities for language, rationality, community, conscience and free choice. Calvin suggests that even our bodies reflect God (i.e., we walk upright rather than crawl on all fours like other creatures). Ethically, God created us to use these higher capacities in three relationships (described below).

According to Genesis 1-2, why has God put us on earth?

Michael Wittmer: Genesis 1:26-28 gives us the meaning of life, or why God put us on earth. He created us in his image in order to love him (Gen. 1:26), to serve others (Gen. 1:27—we are made “male and female”), and to responsibly cultivate the earth (Gen. 1:28—”rule” and “subdue” creation). This is what it means to be human. We are fully human when we love God, sacrificially serve others in our communities of home, church, and neighborhood, and contribute to the development of culture by diligently conducting our various callings for the glory of God.

How has the Fall distorted God’s original intention for His good world?

Michael Wittmer: The Fall has destroyed all of me, ruining my ability to image God. Rather than love God I serve idols, rather than serve others I selfishly fight with them, and rather than discharge my vocations I become lazy or self-indulgent.

The Fall has also destroyed all of God’s world. Human society is ruined (note how quickly Cain killed Abel), animals now devour one another, and even the ground is cursed. Paul says it well in Romans 8:19-22 when he observes that now the “whole creation groans” beneath the weight of sin and its nasty consequences.

You write about the cosmic reach of the Gospel. What does this entail?

Michael Wittmer: The gospel simply retraces the path of sin. It restores all of me, empowering me once again to love God, sacrificially serve others, and faithfully perform my various vocations (i.e., husband, father, church member, professor, author, neighbor, etc.). It also restores all of creation.

Christians should consciously consider how they might bring the rule of Christ into the various spheres of their lives, and thereby begin to fulfill the Lord’s Prayer, “Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” Our homes should be havens of refuge, our friendships should be lubricated with grace, and all of our tasks should be done for the glory of Christ (Col. 3:17, 23).

We should also be concerned for the environment. Too many Christians think that this world doesn’t matter because it is all going to burn up someday (an incorrect reading of 2 Peter 3:10 which I discuss in the book). While plants and animals are not as important as people—who alone are said to bear God’s image, yet they still do matter to God, and so they should also matter to us. Remember that it was God’s idea for Noah to build an Ark and to fill up this precious space with elephants, giraffes, and lightning bugs.

Could the embracing of this holistic Christian living be construed as a license to hedonism?

Michael Wittmer: Surprisingly, and even ironically, the answer is no. Many Christians believe that the way to defeat hedonism and materialism is to spend as little time and concern as possible with earthly things so they have more energy to devote on the spiritual things which really matter. While this seems plausible, most of us are too involved with this world to leave it behind. We have jobs, houses, and bodies that need tending. We initially may feel guilty when our pastor encourages us to devote more time to “the things of God,” but we quickly realize that this is impossible for us.

So in time we tune out this admonition, figuring that the spiritual life is only available to priests, monks, or those in “full-time Christian service.” We have now compartmentalized our lives, dividing our spiritual life on Sunday from our secular activities the rest of the week. This division between the sacred and secular now frees us to live selfishly in our secular pursuits, for, after all, this part of our lives is unspiritual anyhow.

Consequently, many Christians are double-minded, claiming devotion to God when they are doing “spiritual things” but expressing the same hedonistic, materialistic values as their unsaved neighbors in everything else.

Is there a better way? What if we understood redemption in light of creation and the fall? Then we would learn that every part of creation—and every part of me—has been corrupted by sin. So rather than live for myself in the secular world and reserve a space for God in my spiritual life, we would recognize that every area of life—from what I say to where I live and everything in between—must be brought under the lordship of Christ.

Here is the irony: the God who is worth more than the world has sent us back into the world to love it for him. Both Christians and hedonists love the world, but they differ in the reason why. Hedonists love the world for their own sake, while genuine Christians love it for the sake of its Creator and Redeemer. Thus, while an emphasis on creation may seem to provide an excuse for hedonism, it is actually the only way to defeat it. The usual approach, which disparages creation in order to praise the Creator, only succeeds in fostering an unnatural division between the sacred and secular, which in turn encourages us to live for ourselves in the part which doesn’t matter to God.

written by Trevin Wax  © 2007 Kingdom People blog

 
 

Oct

17

2007

Trevin Wax|5:34 am CT

The Mountain
The Mountain avatar

124back.jpg

By the time I had graduated high school, I was certain of my future. I had decided on Cedarville University as my place of higher education. I wanted to major in Mass Communications. During this time, I had sought God’s face about my future.

Don’t think that I was outside the will of God and running from Romania like Jonah from Ninevah. No, Cedarville was not my Tarshish. I firmly believed God had called me to go to Cedarville to school. And I still believe He called me there.

The only thing that kept me from going to Cedarville right out of high school was the price tag. I did not want to start out life up to my neck in school bills and debt, so I decided to take a year off school and work for my family’s printing company. That way, I could set aside some money and go to Cedarville a year later.

It was during that year off from school that I took a mission trip to Romania, and God began leading me to Romania to go to school. At first, the idea seemed absolutely absurd. Romanians were doing anything to get the chance to get educated in the United States. Here I was actually considering moving to Romania for my undergraduate work and studying Theology.

My heart was torn. Why would God be laying this on my heart now? Hadn’t he directed me to Cedarville? Hadn’t he given me the plan much earlier? I felt tricked. God had revealed His will, and now He seemed to be changing His mind. I wasn’t sure if I had misunderstood God the first time, or if I was misunderstanding Him now. Whatever the case, things weren’t adding up. Go to Cedarville. Now go to Romania. In prayer, I tried to make sense of these conflicting commands. Why had God first laid Cedarville on my heart if where He really wanted me to go was Romania?

Perplexed, I spoke privately with my pastor. I poured out my heart and told him the story. Why was God doing this to me? I felt tricked and betrayed, because it seemed that God was suddenly changing His mind, even though I knew God is unchangeable. My pastor told me that the will of God was not some mysterious future that was inherently unknowable. “Trevin, nobody wants you to know God’s will more than God does. He will reveal it to you.” That got me complaining about how difficult it is to discern God’s will for sure. If I was wrong about Cedarville, maybe I haven’t grasped God’s will as easy as I thought I had.

“I don’t know!” I said to my pastor. “I just look at Scripture and see how the great heroes of the faith were led by God. Abraham left his home. Moses, on the mountain, heard God speak from a burning bush. I just haven’t had any burning bush type experience!”

“When was the last time you went to the mountain?” he asked, pointedly.

The mountain. All this time I had been trying to discern God’s will for my life, but never had I slowed down enough to listen to what God might be saying. I hadn’t been to “the mountain” in awhile. A couple days later, I packed some snacks and my Bible and headed out to the river to sit and meditate, praying for discernment.

Unfortunately, I had no burning bush experience. No talking trees. No Angel of the Lord to wrestle with. No thunder from heaven. In the quiet, I didn’t hear anything. Not even the still, small voice.

No, God would use something else, something even more subtle and seemingly insignficant to show me his will. More on that later…

written by Trevin Wax  © 2007 Kingdom People blog

 
 

Oct

17

2007

Trevin Wax|3:28 am CT

10 Things I Wish Jesus Never Said
10 Things I Wish Jesus Never Said avatar

Ten Things I Wish Jesus Never SaidVictor Kuligin is a professor at a theological seminary in Namibia, Africa, where he has been serving for the past twelve years. Kuligin’s crosscultural ministerial experience provides him with great insight into American culture, as he is one who can see the United States from the outside-in. Ten Things I Wish Jesus Never Said is Kuligin’s first book and is a terrific contribution to Christians who wish to take seriously the tough sayings of Christ.

The Ten Things that Kuligin wishes Jesus never said are not surprising. Jesus’ words about hating parents, being poor in spirit, cutting off your limbs, and refraining from judgment are some of the popular “hard sayings” that have been addressed in many other books, most notably F.F. Bruce’s The Hard Sayings of Jesus. What makes Kuligin’s work stand out is the way in which he applies these difficult teachings to modern day life. As a professor in Africa, Kuligin has firsthand experience with the rising popularity of prosperity preaching, and he denounces the movement for the false gospel it promotes.

But Kuligin does not stand back and smugly wag his finger at American culture. You will be hard-pressed to find an author give a more soul-searching, raw and honest self-appraisal. At one point, he even mentions his self-centered desire to see this book find success and bring large financial rewards and then increase his name recognition. 

 Kuligin’s book could be summed up in two words: Crucify yourself. And while this is a hard message to swallow, it is an important aspect of Jesus’ message that today’s Church desperately needs to hear.

written by Trevin Wax  © 2007 Kingdom People blog