<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fundamentalist Survival Mechanism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism</link>
	<description>Kingdom People - Living on Earth as Citizens of Heaven</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fundamentalism through the Looking Glass &#171; Elementary&#8230;My Dear Watson</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Fundamentalism through the Looking Glass &#171; Elementary&#8230;My Dear Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;A movement that receives its identity from protesting is likely to prolong its survival by fi... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;A movement that receives its identity from protesting is likely to prolong its survival by fi&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on the NeoReformed &#171; Kingdom People</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on the NeoReformed &#171; Kingdom People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>[...] I have written elsewhere, the typical &#8220;fundamentalist survival mechanism&#8221; causes these types of groups to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have written elsewhere, the typical &#8220;fundamentalist survival mechanism&#8221; causes these types of groups to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael elsey</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>michael elsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>since the kjv has gone through some revisions, why not give the popular new translations the same opportunity rather than throwing out the whole thing over one word or one passage. has any of the kjv only tried to come up with a comtemporary translation that even all of their own would claim as valid? the anglo world had a comtemporay version in 1611 and its revisions, can i not have the same in my generation? the same goes for worship styles. does any one really think that any of the current worship styles from high church-to emergent really represents what the 1st church did in acts 2? since every generation has laid claim to what they thought was significant expression for them, i would like the same options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since the kjv has gone through some revisions, why not give the popular new translations the same opportunity rather than throwing out the whole thing over one word or one passage. has any of the kjv only tried to come up with a comtemporary translation that even all of their own would claim as valid? the anglo world had a comtemporay version in 1611 and its revisions, can i not have the same in my generation? the same goes for worship styles. does any one really think that any of the current worship styles from high church-to emergent really represents what the 1st church did in acts 2? since every generation has laid claim to what they thought was significant expression for them, i would like the same options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floppyjoe</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Floppyjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>I do not think what constitutes God&#039;s Word is a minor thing. It is the ultimate thing. The new bible versions equate Lucifer with Jesus Christ in many cases. For example:

NIV  Isaiah 14:12-15(In the KJV this passage refers to Lucifer in verse 12)

 12 How you have fallen from heaven,
       O morning star, son of the dawn!
       You have been cast down to the earth,
       you who once laid low the nations!

 13 You said in your heart,
       &quot;I will ascend to heaven;
       I will raise my throne
       above the stars of God;
       I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly,
       on the utmost heights of the sacred mountain.

 14 I will ascend above the tops of the clouds;
       I will make myself like the Most High.&quot;

 15 But you are brought down to the grave,
       to the depths of the pit.

NIV Revelation 22:16(Here Jesus clearly says he is the morning star)

16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.

NIV 2 Peter 1:19

19And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.

There you have it folks Jesus and Satan both called the morning star in the NIV. Which morning star is rising in your heart? I think this bible is fit for the pit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think what constitutes God&#8217;s Word is a minor thing. It is the ultimate thing. The new bible versions equate Lucifer with Jesus Christ in many cases. For example:</p>
<p>NIV  Isaiah 14:12-15(In the KJV this passage refers to Lucifer in verse 12)</p>
<p> 12 How you have fallen from heaven,<br />
       O morning star, son of the dawn!<br />
       You have been cast down to the earth,<br />
       you who once laid low the nations!</p>
<p> 13 You said in your heart,<br />
       &#8220;I will ascend to heaven;<br />
       I will raise my throne<br />
       above the stars of God;<br />
       I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly,<br />
       on the utmost heights of the sacred mountain.</p>
<p> 14 I will ascend above the tops of the clouds;<br />
       I will make myself like the Most High.&#8221;</p>
<p> 15 But you are brought down to the grave,<br />
       to the depths of the pit.</p>
<p>NIV Revelation 22:16(Here Jesus clearly says he is the morning star)</p>
<p>16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.</p>
<p>NIV 2 Peter 1:19</p>
<p>19And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.</p>
<p>There you have it folks Jesus and Satan both called the morning star in the NIV. Which morning star is rising in your heart? I think this bible is fit for the pit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RevJeff</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>RevJeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>well said brother.  My only (somewhat sarcastic)observation would be that PROTESTING does indeed SEEM tp be working for Fred Phelps...  IT IS A JOKE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well said brother.  My only (somewhat sarcastic)observation would be that PROTESTING does indeed SEEM tp be working for Fred Phelps&#8230;  IT IS A JOKE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CRN.Info and Analysis &#187; Separation</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>CRN.Info and Analysis &#187; Separation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a fascinating article about fundamentalist churches and the people who shape their thought. Read the whole thing, but this is the premise from which his conclusions follow: But it can be dangerous to be a fundamentalist. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a fascinating article about fundamentalist churches and the people who shape their thought. Read the whole thing, but this is the premise from which his conclusions follow: But it can be dangerous to be a fundamentalist. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevinwax</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>trevinwax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>Sure, Zach. I&#039;ll add your link to my page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Zach. I&#8217;ll add your link to my page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>Trevin,

Good thoughts here.  Thanks for that.  I think I am going to name my next child Trevin.  Not really, we are done having kids, but if we had another boy!...  :)

Hey, you want to link to each other?

zach</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevin,</p>
<p>Good thoughts here.  Thanks for that.  I think I am going to name my next child Trevin.  Not really, we are done having kids, but if we had another boy!&#8230;  <img src='http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hey, you want to link to each other?</p>
<p>zach</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Take Heed &#171; Christ Church (beta)</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>Take Heed &#171; Christ Church (beta)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>[...]   Published November 10th, 2007   anglicanism , church , worldview Tags: protest      Although the post is speaking about our Baptist friends, this insight is especially important for Anglicans of all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Published November 10th, 2007   anglicanism , church , worldview Tags: protest      Although the post is speaking about our Baptist friends, this insight is especially important for Anglicans of all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevinwax</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>trevinwax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 01:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-fundamentalist-survival-mechanism/#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

Thanks for the feedback. I&#039;m glad you enjoy the blog. I&#039;ve added you to the &quot;Blogs that Link Here&quot; as well.

Blessings to you and your family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. I&#8217;m glad you enjoy the blog. I&#8217;ve added you to the &#8220;Blogs that Link Here&#8221; as well.</p>
<p>Blessings to you and your family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

