<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: True Story 4: The Truncated Cross</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2008/05/29/true-story-4-the-truncated-cross/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2008/05/29/true-story-4-the-truncated-cross/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=true-story-4-the-truncated-cross</link>
	<description>Kingdom People - Living on Earth as Citizens of Heaven</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2008/05/29/true-story-4-the-truncated-cross/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trevinwax.wordpress.com/?p=1340#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>[&quot;Once the atonement theories disappear, we are left with the vague description of Jesus being “infected” so that we could die to our evil and have our goodness rise again. This weak description leads to the embrace of something akin to Catholicism’s “infusion of grace” instead of imputation of righteousness.&quot;] Is pelagianism alive and well? Perhaps with Choung, but not with the RCC. The RCC infusion of grace promised in 2 Pt 1:4 provides that we will &quot;share in the divine nature.&quot; Pelagianism no, but total depravity? No, again. No doubt though that Jesus wants us, our will, and our sins. Bring them all to the cross and give them to him. Be baptized into his death and rise to new life in him (Rom 6)... that&#039;s the atonement story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>["Once the atonement theories disappear, we are left with the vague description of Jesus being “infected” so that we could die to our evil and have our goodness rise again. This weak description leads to the embrace of something akin to Catholicism’s “infusion of grace” instead of imputation of righteousness."] Is pelagianism alive and well? Perhaps with Choung, but not with the RCC. The RCC infusion of grace promised in 2 Pt 1:4 provides that we will &#8220;share in the divine nature.&#8221; Pelagianism no, but total depravity? No, again. No doubt though that Jesus wants us, our will, and our sins. Bring them all to the cross and give them to him. Be baptized into his death and rise to new life in him (Rom 6)&#8230; that&#8217;s the atonement story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

