Now everything else you said can be shown wrong because your entire foundation is wrong.

How will the world know G-d loves them if we “kill” our own? We may not agree with other believers about all things but if we continue to love them the world will know that G-d loves them and that Y’shua died for their sins too.

Hallelujah, brother Michael, for defending the Gospel!

I should have made more clear whose comments I was responding to….it is to Michael Adams. Scroll below my here to see his truth-filled comments. And let me add that because we live in an era that preaches loving people so, so much, many in the church have gotten to loving people first, God second. It is what we do if we compromise the Gospel; that whole mistake is a corruption of the Gospel.

Mine here first:

Why is this dicussion even an issue if Warren was solid?

And then, that fact that it is taking up so much of people’s ‘preaching of the Gospel’ time, speaks mountains.

We do speak the truth in love, but speak it we must. Keep defending that narrow way by keeping it narrow and speaking up against those that try to widen it. It will not be widen and be able to be “The Way”.

Michael’s comments:

1. Huge point missed here.
Much of the discernment is correct here… “IF”
If he had not have endorsed RW as solid.
This is HUGE, I say again Huge.
Dr. Piper has taught and exposed through his writings and teachings a complete dichotomy between Biblical Theology and what RW and his movement teaches.
There is a complete Black and white difference, with no gray areas.
But after years teaching this, to now fuzz clear and distinct lines, and color gray where it is either black or white, is plain wrong.
Warrengate reflects more of a political move, than a Biblical dealing.
However to recklessly attack is wrong.
But just as wrong (not as mean) is to ignore that Biblical values are being crossed out here, and there is a hard line.
Michael Adams | Apr 9, 2010 | Reply

I should have made more clear whose comments I was responding to….it is to Michael Adams. Scroll below my here to see his truth-filled comments. And let me add that because we live in an era that preaches loving people so, so much, many in the church have gotten to loving people first, God second. It is what we do if we compromise the Gospel; that whole mistake is a corruption of the Gospel.

Mine here first:

Why is this dicussion even an issue if Warren was solid?

And then, that fact that it is taking up so much of people’s ‘preaching of the Gospel’ time, speaks mountains.

We do speak the truth in love, but speak it we must. Keep defending that narrow way by keeping it narrow and speaking up against those that try to widen it. It will not be widen and be able to be “The Way”.

1. Huge point missed here.
Much of the discernment is correct here… “IF”
If he had not have endorsed RW as solid.
This is HUGE, I say again Huge.
Dr. Piper has taught and exposed through his writings and teachings a complete dichotomy between Biblical Theology and what RW and his movement teaches.
There is a complete Black and white difference, with no gray areas.
But after years teaching this, to now fuzz clear and distinct lines, and color gray where it is either black or white, is plain wrong.
Warrengate reflects more of a political move, than a Biblical dealing.
However to recklessly attack is wrong.
But just as wrong (not as mean) is to ignore that Biblical values are being crossed out here, and there is a hard line.
Michael Adams | Apr 9, 2010 | Reply

Why is this dicussion even an issue if Warren was solid?

And then, that fact that it is taking up so much of people’s ‘preaching of the Gospel’ time, speaks mountains.

We do speak the truth in love, but speak it, w must. Keep defending that narrow way by keeping it narrow and speaking up against those that try to widen it. It will not be widen and be able to be “The Way”.